“…However, it should be noted that there were very few geochemical measurements in the MARGO compilation from the central tropical Pacific and the MARGO project had to rely on foraminiferal assemblage data, much of it generated for the early CLIMAP study. In contrast, geochemical records from the eastern and western equatorial Pacific from Mg/Ca (Benway et al., 2006; Bolliet et al., 2011; Dang et al., 2020; de Garidel‐Thoron et al., 2005, 2007; Hertzberg et al., 2016; Hollstein et al., 2018; Koutavas & Joanides, 2012; Koutavas et al., 2002; Lea et al., 2000, 2006; Leduc et al., 2007; Rosenthal et al., 2003; Sagawa et al., 2012; Steinke et al., 2006; Stott et al., 2002, 2007), alkenones (Kienast et al., 2001; Koutavas & Sachs, 2008; Leduc et al., 2007), TEX 86 (Hertzberg et al., 2016), and clumped isotopes (Tripati et al., 2014) indicate 1°C–4°C cooling. Several proxy‐based analyses indicate that the magnitude of overall tropical ocean cooling was likely 2.0°C–3.0°C (Ballantyne et al., 2005; Crowley, 2000), much larger than the moderate cooling suggested by CLIMAP and MARGO.…”