2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P-wave monitoring of hydrate-bearing sand during CH4–CO2 replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the P-wave velocity obtained from logging and seismic surveys can be used to estimate the in situ hydrate saturation if the hydrate morphology in actual reservoirs is revealed. P-wave velocity changes during CH 4 eCO 2 replacement in hydrates have also been studied to estimate the sediment stiffness (Espinoza and Santamarina, 2011;Liu et al, 2013). It is therefore important to understand the relationship between the P-wave velocity, hydrate saturation, and hydrate morphology because these properties are deeply linked to the physical properties of hydrate-bearing sediments, such as their permeability, thermal properties, electrical conductivity, and shear strength (Waite et al, 2009;Santamarina and Ruppel, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the P-wave velocity obtained from logging and seismic surveys can be used to estimate the in situ hydrate saturation if the hydrate morphology in actual reservoirs is revealed. P-wave velocity changes during CH 4 eCO 2 replacement in hydrates have also been studied to estimate the sediment stiffness (Espinoza and Santamarina, 2011;Liu et al, 2013). It is therefore important to understand the relationship between the P-wave velocity, hydrate saturation, and hydrate morphology because these properties are deeply linked to the physical properties of hydrate-bearing sediments, such as their permeability, thermal properties, electrical conductivity, and shear strength (Waite et al, 2009;Santamarina and Ruppel, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13a) play important roles in certain GCS concepts, such as carbon sequestration in deep ocean sediments (House et al 2006;Tohidi et al 2010) and CO 2 -CH 4 substitution in natural methane hydrate formations Park et al 2006;Espinoza and Santamarina 2011). The potential usefulness of gas hydrates as a CO 2 storage medium is illustrated by the fact that the molecular CO 2 :H 2 O ratio in these hydrates can be as high as 1:5.75, about 300 times the solubility of CO 2 in water at ambient conditions.…”
Section: Co 2 Clathrate Hydratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH4, although relatively short-lived in the atmosphere (approximately 10 years), is a potent greenhouse gas that absorbs infrared radiation approximately 25 times more efficiently than CO2 [9]. Enhanced hydrate stability can be accommodated through CO2 exchange while benefitting from gas production and maintained structural integrity [10,11]. Other benefits are reduced seepage where CO2 hydrate itself becomes an additional sealing layer [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%