2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen uptake kinetics and middle distance swimming performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
15
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the observed V O peak values were similar to those obtained for the 100 m front crawl (Reis et al 2010;Rodriguez et al 2003), but lower than those presented for the 200 m front crawl , evidencing that appropriate oxygen supply and utilization should not be neglected even in short duration swimming efforts (if conducted at maximal intensity). Corroborating these findings, the V O 2 mean amplitude value was not only comparable to that previously described for extreme intensity effort ), but also similar to the values observed for severe intensity swimming (Fernandes and Vilas-Boas 2012; Reis et al 2012b;Sousa et al 2014), where V O 2max is commonly attained. Nevertheless, it is important to note that these comparisons did not consider the eventual V O 2max dissimilarities among subjects of the different reported studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, the observed V O peak values were similar to those obtained for the 100 m front crawl (Reis et al 2010;Rodriguez et al 2003), but lower than those presented for the 200 m front crawl , evidencing that appropriate oxygen supply and utilization should not be neglected even in short duration swimming efforts (if conducted at maximal intensity). Corroborating these findings, the V O 2 mean amplitude value was not only comparable to that previously described for extreme intensity effort ), but also similar to the values observed for severe intensity swimming (Fernandes and Vilas-Boas 2012; Reis et al 2012b;Sousa et al 2014), where V O 2max is commonly attained. Nevertheless, it is important to note that these comparisons did not consider the eventual V O 2max dissimilarities among subjects of the different reported studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, both linear and non-linear analyses were performed to find the best model for each point of interest. The study is limited since variables such as physiological parameters [61], anthropometric characteristics [62], training data [62], previous experience [63], nutrition [64,65] and motivational [66] factors were not considered but may have influenced the results. Further studies need to investigate why swimming speeds in elite long-distance swimming plateaued from 2000–2012 and why the sex difference of performance in long-distance swimming was smaller than expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a methodological standpoint, swimming imposes limitations in obtaining valid and reliable measures of VO 2 kinetics [11,23], and it was only recently that the development of swimming snorkels suitable for breath-by-breath portable oxymetry [16,24] allowed assessing VO 2 dynamics in pool conditions. However, most studies have focused on constant-load, 6-7-min square transitions within the range of moderate to severe-intensity exercise [19,21,22,31]. Whereas VO 2 kinetics parameters within these intensity domains have been related to sports performance [4,15], the physiological responses within the extreme-intensity exercise domain and their relation with exercise performance are still largely unexplored, particularly in swimming.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%