2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2015.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen adsorption on Fe(110) surface revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of a higher coverage of 0.66, the adsorption of oxygen at the 3-fold hollow sites must also be allowed. 22 Again, the geometrical models of the adsorption structures were verified using a DFT calculation, in which the adsorption geometries were modeled in the experimentally found (3 × 2) unit cell with a coverage of 2/3. All possible geometries with oxygen at lb and th sites were considered, and independently of the initial configurations, all oxygen atoms relaxed to th sites.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of a higher coverage of 0.66, the adsorption of oxygen at the 3-fold hollow sites must also be allowed. 22 Again, the geometrical models of the adsorption structures were verified using a DFT calculation, in which the adsorption geometries were modeled in the experimentally found (3 × 2) unit cell with a coverage of 2/3. All possible geometries with oxygen at lb and th sites were considered, and independently of the initial configurations, all oxygen atoms relaxed to th sites.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positions of all atoms in the supercells were fully relaxed and optimized until the forces on each atom were <0.01 eV/Å. Other computational details are the same as in ref 22. The most stable structure was selected by the calculation of the adsorption energy defined as …”
Section: Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They did not comment upon this discrepancy beyond stating it is "not stable", though this instability indicates that the oxygen atoms do not reside at the lb site at the highest coverage. Ossowski and Kiejna, however, indicated that for all coverages, the 3f site is most stable, with a small energy difference at low coverages between the lb and 3f sites [34]. Most recently, Freindl et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They deduced that O atoms adsorb at long-bridge (lb) sites for low exposure, with a single vibration at around 500 cm Theoretical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) of the adsorption of O atoms on the Fe(110) surface were first reported in the early 2000s. These DFT studies primarily investigated the (2×2), (3×1) and (1×1) geometries [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. There is consensus in the literature regarding the adsorption energy, which linearly increased from ~1.40 eV to 3.50 eV per O atom from low to high coverage [30,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation