2003
DOI: 10.1080/0953732032000046051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership Structure, Technological Endowment and Competitive Advantage: Do Democracy and Business Fit?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, most RBV studies consider several financial indicators to assess performance (Melville, Kraemer, & Gurbaxani, 2004). Scholars have also considered the firm's relative position in the market (Bruque, Moyano, Vargas, & Hern andez, 2003), growth in sales (Tippins & Sohi, 2003) and revenue (Rai, Patnayakuni, & Seth, 2006). In this study, our focus was on the effect of crowdsourcing for marketing and innovation purposes.…”
Section: Organisational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, most RBV studies consider several financial indicators to assess performance (Melville, Kraemer, & Gurbaxani, 2004). Scholars have also considered the firm's relative position in the market (Bruque, Moyano, Vargas, & Hern andez, 2003), growth in sales (Tippins & Sohi, 2003) and revenue (Rai, Patnayakuni, & Seth, 2006). In this study, our focus was on the effect of crowdsourcing for marketing and innovation purposes.…”
Section: Organisational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.-La literatura existente señala efectos positivos en su posición competitiva (Bruque et al, 2003, Del Águila y Padilla, 2010, Vargas, 2004, sus resultados empresariales (Gargallo y Pérez, 2009, Fernández y Peña, 2009, la implicación y participación de sus trabajadores/as (Bruque y Moyano, 2007), así como en el compromiso de la empresa con la innovación (Espasandín, Casanueva y Ganaza, 2004…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Cooperatives differ from capitalist companies in that they ''put people at the centre of their business and not capital'' (ICA). In other words, while the underlying motivation for a capitalist company is the possibility for shareholders to obtain profits on their investments in the business, the main incentive for a cooperative company is the satisfaction of a common socio-economic necessity (Bruque et al, 2003). As the ICA website states, cooperatives follow ''a broader set of values than those associated purely with making a profit.''…”
Section: The Cooperative Model: a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values include: self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity and solidarity (ICA). In a cooperative, organizational power is related to the individual but not to the capital -active participation in the production and/or commercialization process is what legitimizes an individual's decision-making capacity (Bruque et al, 2003). The democratic decisions made by a cooperative thus balance ''the need for profitability with the needs of their members and the wider interests of the community'' (ICA).…”
Section: The Cooperative Model: a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%