2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1202.0984
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|
Birte Glimm,
Aidan Hogan,
Markus Krötzsch
et al.

Abstract: Seven years on from OWL becoming a W3C recommendation, and two years on from the more recent OWL 2 W3C recommendation, OWL has still experienced only patchy uptake on the Web. Although certain OWL features (like owl:sameAs) are very popular, other features of OWL are largely neglected by publishers in the Linked Data world. This may suggest that despite the promise of easy implementations and the proposal of tractable profiles suggested in OWL's second version, there is still no "right" standard fragment for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation of this relevance can only be done through the statistical measure of the use cases and the actual problems in the area. This has been done in the Linked Data context [Glimm et al, 2012], but it remains to be done in a OBDA context, to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of this relevance can only be done through the statistical measure of the use cases and the actual problems in the area. This has been done in the Linked Data context [Glimm et al, 2012], but it remains to be done in a OBDA context, to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%