2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00096-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

65
3,828
3
198

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,840 publications
(4,096 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
65
3,828
3
198
Order By: Relevance
“…Major factors influencing empirical estimates of f PAR using SVIs are vegetation spectral properties, pixel heterogeneity, background reflectance, solar zenith and view zenith angle, vegetation shadow fractions, atmospheric scattering and bidirectional reflectance effects (Li and Strahler, 1985;Myneni and Williams, 1994). Some of these factors can be mitigated using more advanced indexing techniques such as the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) (Huete et al, 2002;, which seek to enhance the vegetation signal with improved sensitivity in high biomass regions thereby de-coupling canopy background signals and reducing atmospheric influences, however, broad scaled direct application of vegetation indices remains challenging (e.g. Running and Nemani, 1988).…”
Section: Empirical Determination Of Absorbed Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major factors influencing empirical estimates of f PAR using SVIs are vegetation spectral properties, pixel heterogeneity, background reflectance, solar zenith and view zenith angle, vegetation shadow fractions, atmospheric scattering and bidirectional reflectance effects (Li and Strahler, 1985;Myneni and Williams, 1994). Some of these factors can be mitigated using more advanced indexing techniques such as the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) (Huete et al, 2002;, which seek to enhance the vegetation signal with improved sensitivity in high biomass regions thereby de-coupling canopy background signals and reducing atmospheric influences, however, broad scaled direct application of vegetation indices remains challenging (e.g. Running and Nemani, 1988).…”
Section: Empirical Determination Of Absorbed Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EVI is directly related to the photosynthetic production of plants and indirectly related to the green biomass (Huete et al, 2002). As a result, the EVI remains sensitive to increases in canopy density beyond the level where the NDVI becomes saturated (Huete et al, 2002). Xiao et al (2004) also found that the EVI had a stronger linear relationship with the gross primary production than did the NDVI.…”
Section: Selection Of the Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The EVI is less sensitive to soil and atmospheric effects than the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) because it incorporates the blue spectral band. The EVI is directly related to the photosynthetic production of plants and indirectly related to the green biomass (Huete et al, 2002). As a result, the EVI remains sensitive to increases in canopy density beyond the level where the NDVI becomes saturated (Huete et al, 2002).…”
Section: Selection Of the Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was modified for generating MODIS vegetation indices by incorporating the smallest view angle constraint to minimize sensor view variations associated with the anisotropic surface reflectance properties, i.e., Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) and helps reduce spatial and temporal discontinuities in the composited product [59].…”
Section: Etm+ Ndvi Composingmentioning
confidence: 99%