2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00922-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overestimation of grey matter atrophy in glioblastoma patients following radio(chemo)therapy

Abstract: Objective Brain atrophy has the potential to become a biomarker for severity of radiation-induced side-effects. Particularly brain tumour patients can show great MRI signal changes over time caused by e.g. oedema, tumour progress or necrosis. The goal of this study was to investigate if such changes affect the segmentation accuracy of normal appearing brain and thus influence longitudinal volumetric measurements. Materials and methods T1-weighted MR images… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tumor-containing hemisphere was masked during all analyses as SPM is unable to correctly identify and segment gray matter and white matter in the proximity of tumors. Together with the selective flipping, this process ensures that the “tumor-free” hemisphere can be reliably analyzed [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tumor-containing hemisphere was masked during all analyses as SPM is unable to correctly identify and segment gray matter and white matter in the proximity of tumors. Together with the selective flipping, this process ensures that the “tumor-free” hemisphere can be reliably analyzed [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each T1w image was segmented into grey matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using SPM12 (Statistical Parametric Mapping: https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/ ) after censoring abnormal tissue using abnormal tissue ROIs created from the corresponding FLAIR images at that particular timepoint [28] . The sum of all GM and WM probabilities within each subcortical label was used to calculate the corresponding subcortical volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%