2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming bias in ground-based surveys of hollow-bearing trees using double-sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
65
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recorded the number and location of all known bobuck den-trees (identiWed by radio-tracking; see Martin 2006;Martin et al 2007a) and every other tree that we judged from the ground to potentially contain a hollow large enough to make a suitable bobuck den-site (termed "other hollow-bearing trees"). Although there are diYculties associated with establishing the occurrence of tree-hollows from the ground (Gibbons and Lindenmayer 2002;Harper et al 2004), our judgement was based on the large size and visibility of the openings of the hollows we have observed bobucks using. We recorded a series of variables for all known den-trees and other hollow-bearing trees including species, diameter at breast height (DBH) within nine size classes (30-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, 81-90, 91-100, 101-110 and >111 cm) and distance to the nearest silver wattle tree.…”
Section: Vegetation Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recorded the number and location of all known bobuck den-trees (identiWed by radio-tracking; see Martin 2006;Martin et al 2007a) and every other tree that we judged from the ground to potentially contain a hollow large enough to make a suitable bobuck den-site (termed "other hollow-bearing trees"). Although there are diYculties associated with establishing the occurrence of tree-hollows from the ground (Gibbons and Lindenmayer 2002;Harper et al 2004), our judgement was based on the large size and visibility of the openings of the hollows we have observed bobucks using. We recorded a series of variables for all known den-trees and other hollow-bearing trees including species, diameter at breast height (DBH) within nine size classes (30-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, 81-90, 91-100, 101-110 and >111 cm) and distance to the nearest silver wattle tree.…”
Section: Vegetation Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method does not provide accurate counts of hollow abundance (Healy et al, 1989;Harper et al, 2004). Viewing hollows from a distance can be difficult, especially under low light conditions, or when obscured by foliage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire damage to the bark, sap stains or other marks can be mistakenly identified as being a hollow. In addition, most definitions of a hollow include a minimum depth (Whitford, 2002;Harper et al, 2004), which cannot be accurately determined from the ground. This means that not all cavities identified during ground-based surveys will meet the definition of being a true hollow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations