2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-008-9241-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art

Abstract: In order to remedy the limitations due to the scarcity of strong evidence about this topic, future studies should try to clarify predictive value of markers in groups of specific diseases-related subfertility and pay special attention to propaedeutic multivariate models including anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum and ultrasonographic markers have been tested to infer the gonadal reserve of infertile women, but none has been proven to reflect the complex follicular dynamics or be strongly correlated with the size and/or quality of the primordial follicles remaining in the gonads. Thus, these tests do not ideally reflect the pool of unrecruited follicles, which may be responsible for ovulatory cycles and the long-term reproductive potential [25][26][27][28]. Age, menstrual cycle length, basal serum FSH, basal estradiol, clomiphene citrate challenge test, AFC, ovarian volume, and ovarian blood flow had been reported to evaluate ovarian reserve, but we need more markers to make the cycle cheaper and more likely to be successful [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum and ultrasonographic markers have been tested to infer the gonadal reserve of infertile women, but none has been proven to reflect the complex follicular dynamics or be strongly correlated with the size and/or quality of the primordial follicles remaining in the gonads. Thus, these tests do not ideally reflect the pool of unrecruited follicles, which may be responsible for ovulatory cycles and the long-term reproductive potential [25][26][27][28]. Age, menstrual cycle length, basal serum FSH, basal estradiol, clomiphene citrate challenge test, AFC, ovarian volume, and ovarian blood flow had been reported to evaluate ovarian reserve, but we need more markers to make the cycle cheaper and more likely to be successful [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal marker would show a significant change in levels from adolescence to the late reproductive period and should enable age-independent prediction of an individual's reproductive life span and spontaneous pregnancy in the general population. Ovarian reserve tests include a variety of biochemical and ultrasound parameters (1)(2)(3)(4). Currently available ultrasound tests of ovarian reserve include antral follicular count (AFC), ovarian volume, and Doppler assessment of ovarian blood flow (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elle pourrait constituer un marqueur plus précoce de l'appauvrissement ovarien [37]. Cependant, la technique de dosage de cette hormone reste actuellement difficile à maîtriser et empêche donc une définition précise des normes ;…”
Section: éValuation De La Réserve Ovarienneunclassified