2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During On- Versus Off-hours (A Harmonizing Outcomes With RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI] Trial Substudy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
27
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are congruent with previous reports from Netherlands and US [17,18], although others have reported different findings [7,9,10,19]. Even though regional differences in clinical praxis and organization of the health care system could explain these divergent outcomes, there are also important differences in study design.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results are congruent with previous reports from Netherlands and US [17,18], although others have reported different findings [7,9,10,19]. Even though regional differences in clinical praxis and organization of the health care system could explain these divergent outcomes, there are also important differences in study design.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In patients with cardiac arrest, a comparable bolus volume was administered without clinically relevant pulmonary congestion 23. In addition, the rate of arrhythmic events is similar to existing data 24 25. There were no adverse events associated with the cooling procedure itself.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Several studies have assessed in-hospital, medium and long-term outcomes for PCI therapy during on-hours compared to off-hours. Distinct longer delay times during off-hours are found in most of these studies, but there are conflicting results in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes for patients treated during off-hours (Beohar et al, 2001;Berger et al, 2006;Casella et al, 2011;Cubeddu et al, 2013;De Luca et al, 2005;Jneid et al, 2008;Noman et al, 2012;Ortolani et al, 2007;Sadeghi et al, 2004;Saleem et al, 2004;Uyarel et al, 2009;Zahn et al, 1999). These conflicting results may be due to presentation of sicker patients and less successful PCI procedures during off-hours (Glaser et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%