In 1975, Haley investigated a series of neonatal infections at a large municipal hospital and determined that understaffing and overcrowding had contributed significantly to the outbreak. 1 Almost 25 years later, though intuitive to infection control practitioners, surprisingly little controlled evidence exists to support this concept. The paper by Harbath et al in this issue identifies and measures the effects of understaffing, overcrowding, and handwashing on an outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU). 2 The authors conclude that these factors had a primary role in sustaining the outbreak, which was only brought under control when they were changed.Molecular epidemiology provides an opportunity to examine cross-infections in a scientific manner, and organisms such as E cloacae lend themselves to this kind of investigation. 3 Because most infection control practitioners, if not all physicians, are trained that hand washing is the single most important factor in the prevention of nosocomial infections, the facts are often fit to the hypothesis. Identical organisms can be tracked from patient to patient, observations are made of poor handwashing technique, and the conclusion is reached that these are cause and effect. Undoubtedly, cross-infections account for many nosocomial infections in ICUs. Almost all published reports of observations of hand washing by physicians and nurses lament their performance at this most basic of aseptic practices 45 ; but, if epidemiology is about measurement, where are there data that describe the magnitude of the effect that these practices (or their lack) have on the occurrence of epidemics?If we are to assign time and resources to hand washing and isolation, should we not quantify how much of these is necessary to prevent an outbreak? If we cannot maintain an absolute standard of hand washing between each and every patient contact, what is a reasonable median that will achieve what we need? Are there differences among organisms in their capacity to be spread from patient to patient in this manner? What is the role of antibiotic prescribing in contributing to the colonization and so the reservoir of epidemic resistant organisms?Modern ICUs present an environment remarkably well suited to the transmission of infection. Although patients are increasingly immunocompromised and thus susceptible to infection, many units were designed with inadequate space for all the equipment in current use and the procedures that are likely to occur. As an example, peritoneal lavage through an abdominal zipper is common in many surgical ICUs, affording an opportunity to contaminate much of the immediate environment with fecal organisms. When an epidemic is caused by an easily recognized organism such as a drug-resistant Salmonella species or Clostridium difficile, the contribution to the outbreak of the contaminated environment is easily recognized 67 ; but, when the organisms causing infections are not so easily distinguished from "normal" ICU patient flora, the ease...