Outbreak Investigation of COVID-19 Among Residents and Staff of an Independent and Assisted Living Community for Older Adults in Seattle, Washington

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused epidemic spread of coronavirus disease 2019 in the Seattle, Washington, metropolitan area, with morbidity and mortality concentrated among residents of skilled nursing facilities. The prevalence of COVID-19 among older adults in independent/assisted living is not understood.OBJECTIVES To conduct surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 and describe symptoms of COVID-19 among residents and staff of an independent/assisted living community. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn March 2020, public health surveillance of staff and residents was conducted on site at an assisted and independent living residence for older adults in Seattle, Washington, after exposure to 2 residents who were hospitalized with COVID-19.EXPOSURES Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a congregate setting implementing social isolation and infection prevention protocols.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed on nasopharyngeal swabs from residents and staff; a symptom questionnaire was completed assessing fever, cough, and other symptoms for the preceding 14 days. Residents were retested for SARS-CoV-2 7 days after initial screening. RESULTSTesting was performed on 80 residents; 62 were women (77%), with mean age of 86 (range, 69-102) years. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 3 of 80 residents (3.8%); none felt ill, 1 male resident reported resolved cough and 1 loose stool during the preceding 14 days. Virus was also detected in 2 of 62 staff (3.2%); both were symptomatic. One week later, resident SARS-CoV-2 testing was repeated and 1 new infection detected (asymptomatic). All residents remained in isolation and were clinically stable 14 days after the second test.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic residents highlights challenges in protecting older adults living in congregate settings. In this study, symptom screening failed to identify residents with infections and all 4 residents with SARS-CoV-2 remained asymptomatic after 14 days. Although 1 asymptomatic infection was found on retesting, a widespread facility outbreak was avoided. Compared with skilled nursing settings, in assisted/independent living communities, early surveillance to identify asymptomatic persons among residents and staff, in combination with adherence to recommended preventive strategies, may reduce viral spread.

COVID-19 in long-term care homes in Ontario and British Columbia

“…27 In addition, subcontracted staff may have less access to paid sick leave -a critical element in allowing staff to self-isolate when ill. All of this is in line with evidence that staff are the main vectors of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in LTC facilities. [28][29][30] We are unaware of data that allow for comparisons of wages and rates of multisite employment between Ontario and British Columbia.…”

Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: A living systematic review and meta-analysis

“…In nine studies that reported on close contacts of infected individuals and aggregated data from clusters of both asymptomatic and symptomatic people with SARS-CoV-2 the summary estimate was 14% (95% CI 8%-23%, prediction interval 2%-53%) [36,47,60,62,66,72,105,108,111]. We included 12 studies (n = 675 people) that reported on outbreak investigations arising from a single symptomatic person or from the country's first imported cases of people with COVID-19 [32,43,48,58,61,68,71,90,94,95,97,100]. Four of the outbreaks involved nursing homes [58,68,71,94] and four involved occupational settings [43,61,90,95].…”

“…We included 12 studies (n = 675 people) that reported on outbreak investigations arising from a single symptomatic person or from the country's first imported cases of people with COVID-19 [32,43,48,58,61,68,71,90,94,95,97,100]. Four of the outbreaks involved nursing homes [58,68,71,94] and four involved occupational settings [43,61,90,95]. The summary estimate of…”

Comparison of infection control strategies to reduce COVID-19 outbreaks in homeless shelters in the United States: a simulation study

“…Each infection control strategy is limited in some aspect (22,(49)(50)(51)(52)(53). Symptom-based screening has very low sensitivity to detect infections early in the clinical course (when people are most infectious), and poor specificity (12)(13)(14)54). The impact of routine PCR testing is limited by imperfect PCR sensitivity (~75%), especially early in the infection course (19), as well as need for frequent testing and missing onset of infectiousness between testing periods.…”