2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2016.2615626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outage-Constrained Sensing Threshold Design for Decentralized Decision-Making in Cognitive Radio Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the features characterizing of cognitive radio, it is pertinent to think about what could be considered a good combination of m and n. For a fixed K = n − m, it is possible to have different combinations of n and m, but although m ⟶ n would seem a good option especially when n is greater than or equal to 10, because redundancy is significantly reduced, this implies two considerations: (i) dispersion and recovery times increase, and (ii) what is even more important, the probability that K or more faults occur increases with n, as argued below. Consider two instances of IDA with parameters (5,3) and (10,8), respectively. Both offer the same tolerance, but the second case does so with a lower cost in redundancy (0.666 vs. 0.25, respectively).…”
Section: Additional Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the features characterizing of cognitive radio, it is pertinent to think about what could be considered a good combination of m and n. For a fixed K = n − m, it is possible to have different combinations of n and m, but although m ⟶ n would seem a good option especially when n is greater than or equal to 10, because redundancy is significantly reduced, this implies two considerations: (i) dispersion and recovery times increase, and (ii) what is even more important, the probability that K or more faults occur increases with n, as argued below. Consider two instances of IDA with parameters (5,3) and (10,8), respectively. Both offer the same tolerance, but the second case does so with a lower cost in redundancy (0.666 vs. 0.25, respectively).…”
Section: Additional Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 15 years, there has been exhaustive research to solve the main issues to make CR networks (CRN) effective and practical [1][2][3][4][5]. Several authors have proposed different functionalities for CR devices which can be divided into four main functionalities, such as spectrum sensing [6,7], decision-making [8], sharing, and mobility in order to solve the OSA efficiently [9]. These functionalities depend on the interpretation and adaptation of different parameters, for example, sensing and data interpretation for adaptive modulation, power adjustments, and the changes regarding the range of frequency operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, before going into further discussion about existing time triggered handoff strategies, we depict the behavior of a CR user under time triggered handoff scenario in Figure 4. The process starts with the detection of PU arrival and predicting PU stayed duration on its licensed channel via continuous sensing [45][5]. One possibility for an SU is to predetermine target channels for spectrum handoff, thus keeping a list of channels before transmission.…”
Section: Time Triggered Handoff Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%