2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.075118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillating fidelity susceptibility near a quantum multicritical point

Abstract: We study scaling behavior of the geometric tensor χ α,β (λ1, λ2) and the fidelity susceptibility (χF) in the vicinity of a quantum multicritical point (MCP) using the example of a transverse XY model. We show that the behavior of the geometric tensor (and thus of χF) is drastically different from that seen near a critical point. In particular, we find that is highly non-monotonic function of λ along the generic direction λ1 ∼ λ2 = λ when the system size L is bounded between the shorter and longer correlation l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
78
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As illustrated in Fig. 7, numerics compares very well to (36) and (37). The prefactor √ 2 is seen in numerical simulations when N ≫ γ/|(1−|c|)δ|.…”
Section: Xy Modelmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As illustrated in Fig. 7, numerics compares very well to (36) and (37). The prefactor √ 2 is seen in numerical simulations when N ≫ γ/|(1−|c|)δ|.…”
Section: Xy Modelmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It has been proposed that there are two divergent characteristic length scales that have to be taken into account around it: one characterized by the scaling exponent ν = 1/2 and the other by ν = 1 [37]. We will study here…”
Section: Xy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the scaling of fidelity, it is well-known that one can switch from the thermodynamic limit to the fidelity susceptibility (χ F (λ)) limit 27,[37][38][39] (where the notion of the fidelity susceptibility is meaningful) when δ −ν ≫ L. Continuing along the same line of arguments, one can define the heat susceptibility χ E 27 such that W T =0 irr ∼ δ 2 χ E , when δ −ν (i.e, δ → 0) is the largest length scale. In this limit, one expects a scaling W T =0 irr ∼ δ 2 λ −α away from the QCP and on the other hand, close to the QCP, L plays the role of the scaling variable in lieu of λ.…”
Section: Scaling Relations Of Wirr and ∆Sirrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to local order parameters in the conventional Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm based on the spontaneous symmetry breaking mechanism, in connections between quantum information and QPTs, quantum entanglement, i.e., a purely quantum correlation being absent in classical systems, can be used as an indicator of QPTs driven by quantum fluctuations in quantum many-body systems 3 . Quantum fidelity, based on the basic notions of quantum mechanics on quantum measurement, has also provided an another way to characterize QPTs [4][5][6][7] . In the last few years, various quantum fidelity approaches such as fidelity per lattice site (FLS) 4 , reduced fidelity 8 , fidelity susceptibility 9 , density-functional fidelity 9 , and operator fidelity 10 , have been suggested and implemented to explore QPTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that groundstates in different phases should be orthogonal due to their distinguishability in the thermodynamic limit allows a fidelity between quantum many-body states in different phases signaling QPTs because an abrupt change of the fidelity is expected across a critical point in the thermodynamic limit [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . Thus, the fidelity has great advantages to characterize the QPTs in a variety of quantum lattice systems because the groundstate of a system undergoes a drastic change in its structure at a critical point, regardless of of what type of internal orders are present in quantum many-body states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%