Orthorexia nervosa in dietitians and dietetics students—prevalence, risk factors, and interventions: a scoping review using a systematic approach

Abstract

Context Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is characterized by compulsive behaviors and increased concerns about healthful eating. Dietitians appear to be especially vulnerable to ON, and it is still debatable whether the disordered eating behaviors motivate individuals to enroll in nutrition programs, or whether these behaviors result from an exaggerated preoccupation with healthy eating triggered during their nutrition studies. Objective The aim was to provide an overview of the present state of knowledge about the prevalence, risk factors, and interventions addressing ON among dietitians and dietetics students. More specifically, it was examined whether dietitians and dietetics students differ from students attending different education programs or other health professionals with regard to the severity and risk factors of ON, and whether the extent of ON changes during the progression in the nutrition education years of study. Data Sources MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane, ProQuest Central, CABI, ProQuest Dissertations, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink were searched on May 8, 2021, and updated on November 12, 2022. Data Extraction Records were screened for eligibility; study characteristics, methodology, and findings of included articles were extracted; and the methodological quality assessed using the AXIS tool. Each step was preceded by a calibration exercise and conducted independently and in duplicate by pairs of 2 reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved through discussions. Data Analysis A narrative synthesis was performed, whereby the characteristics, methodologies, and results of included studies were compared. Conclusions Results were inconclusive; yet, a general status of the relatively “high” prevalence of ON among dietitians and dietetics students was established, stressing the need for systematic research to understand and mitigate orthorexic tendencies in this group. It is still too early to answer questions pertaining to prevalence, risk factors, interventions, and differences between dietetics students and other majors when it comes to severity and progress of ON throughout the continuing years of study, or between dietitians and other professional groups. Systematic review registration Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BY5KF.

The Impact of Sustainability Courses: Are They Effective in Improving Diet Quality and Anthropometric Indices?

“…A possible reason for this situation is that the CFP and WFP values were adjusted to 2000 kcal. Considering that the energy intake of nutrition and dietetics students is generally lower [ 62 , 63 ], it is thought that there may be differences in the data obtained without adjustment.…”