Orthopedic Device-Related Infections Due to Emerging Pathogens Diagnosed by a Combination of Microbiological Approaches: Case Series and Literature Review

Abstract

Orthopedic and trauma device-related infections (ODRI) due to high virulence microorganisms are a devastating complication after orthopedic surgery. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) are mainly involved but commensal bacteria, located in human mucous membranes, are emerging pathogens in ODRI. Currently, bacterial culture is the gold standard for ODRI but the diagnostic process remains time consuming and laborious. We evaluated a combination of microbiological approaches in the diagnosis of emerging pathogens involved in ODRI. We analyzed two synovial fluids, five tissue samples and five surgical wound swabs from two different patients with ODRI, attending the Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery of Mater Domini Teaching Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy. Identification was carried out with a combination of microbiological approaches (culture, mass spectrometry and 16s rRNA gene sequencing). We demonstrated the importance of a combination of microbiological approaches for the diagnosis of emerging pathogens in ODRI, because the low number of cases in the literature makes it very difficult to formulate guidelines for the management of patients.

Knee Arthrodesis for Periprosthetic Knee Infection: Fusion Rate, Complications, and Limb Salvage—A Systematic Review

“…Moreover, in half of the cases, an infection with multiple causative pathogens was noted. The data concur with those reported by Vasso et al [5], who determined the incidence and predictors of failure in patients treated with two-stage reimplantation for PJI and found that the number of highly virulent bacterial infections increased due to inappropriate antibiotic treatment strategies in community and health care settings [36][37][38]. Other studies have also reported that Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and PJI caused by multiple causative bacteria were risk factors for amputation [39].…”

Basic concepts, recent advances, and future perspectives in the diagnosis of bovine mastitis

“…The BD phoenix and VITEK 2 systems are based on automated biochemical reactions to enhance the efficacy of the microbial identification products [ 34 35 ]. Recently, this method was developed using a fluorescence system to detect the metabolic changes produced by various microorganisms [ 36 ]. An accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)of 98%, 86%, and 99%, respectively, were achieved for the diagnosis of contagious and EM [ 32 ].…”

“…Veterinarians and farmers have been using (cow-side or on-site) tests to detect mastitis as they require relatively little training. Somatic cell counting detects milk quality and screens for intramammary infections [ 36 ]. The Se, Sp, and accuracy of SCC were 86.60%, 97.76%, and 91.94%, respectively, with a PPV and NPV of 98.33% and 84.52%, respectively [ 39 ].…”

Change in Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in the Treatment-Failure Era

“…In line with what has been said so far, PCR performed on feces could be the most promising tool for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection due to its numerous strengths: (i) high sensitivity and specificity, (ii) rapid execution, (iii) low costs, (iv) significant reduction in TAT compared to conventional methods (<1 day using PCR vs. >7 days through culture isolation), and (v) possibility of performing genotypic antibiogram directly from biological samples, overcoming the issue of bacterial growth. However, molecular techniques need confirmation through conventional methods, especially regarding fastidious pathogens, because (i) bacterial DNA positivity does not imply vitality, (ii) evaluation of resistance gene expression does not necessarily imply translation into proteins, and (iii) the genotypic antibiogram does not provide a MIC value [75][76][77]. However, the execution of PCR on biopsy samples remains controversial in light of the few studies in the literature.…”