1994
DOI: 10.2307/2943824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Change as Paradigm Shift: Analysis of the Change Process in a Large, Public University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Creeping institutional change in the transnational space may bring an incremental solidification of new institutionalised assumptions and practices (Djelic & Quack, 2003, p. 309), such that organisations must adjust their structures and practices to these new paradigms in order to remain legitimate (cf. Simsek & Louis, 1994). Thus, the organisations' representations of their work may be acts of ceremony, which allow their actions to appear rational with respect to changing paradigms.…”
Section: Explaining the Strategic Shiftmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Creeping institutional change in the transnational space may bring an incremental solidification of new institutionalised assumptions and practices (Djelic & Quack, 2003, p. 309), such that organisations must adjust their structures and practices to these new paradigms in order to remain legitimate (cf. Simsek & Louis, 1994). Thus, the organisations' representations of their work may be acts of ceremony, which allow their actions to appear rational with respect to changing paradigms.…”
Section: Explaining the Strategic Shiftmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, Cascadia would need to focus on customer satisfaction as a hallmark of an effective program, as would the students on entering the workforce. For them to persist, succeed, and attain their goals and for employers to seek them out and offer them career opportunities, Cascadia's programs needed to be engaging and relevant (Case, 1995;Freiberg and Freiberg, 1996;Hammer and Champy, 1993;McIntyre, 1996;Rifkin, 1995;Rowley, Lujan, and Dolence, 1997;Simsek and Louis, 1994;Weisbord, 1992;Zemsky, 1994).…”
Section: Deriving the Design Principlesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Through those, the following can be provided: (a) School images, new ideas and information on organizational functioning of schools, (b) reflection of what is significant or not according to prevailing values, interests and shared understandings, (c) removing perceptual differences between administrators and teachers caused particularly by rapid changes and gathering stakeholders around a shared vision (Leech, & Fulton, 2008;Morgan, 2001). For instance, considering schools as "organized anarchies" expresses both the unpredictability of organizational changes and the presence of different political actors with various interests and agendas in an attempt to get involved in management of these organizations only with two words (Simsek & Louis, 1994).…”
Section: Modeling Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%