1997
Oral lichen planus and hepatitis C virus infection: a fortuitous association?
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
54
12
3
2
Citation Types
1
32
0
4
Year Published
1998
2023
Publication Types
Select...
63
3
1
Relationship
1
66
Authors
Journals
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
References 8 publications
1
32
0
4
“…To‐date, the majority of the studies included predominately OLP patients 13,25,31,33,36,45–49,51,56,66,72–74 and only few studies included exclusively or predominately patients with cutaneous LP 27,28,37,40,41,43,44 . The fact that OLP was present only in 41% of our studied patients makes our results comparable to the studies by Harman et al 28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…To‐date, the majority of the studies included predominately OLP patients 13,25,31,33,36,45–49,51,56,66,72–74 and only few studies included exclusively or predominately patients with cutaneous LP 27,28,37,40,41,43,44 . The fact that OLP was present only in 41% of our studied patients makes our results comparable to the studies by Harman et al 28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Of interest was the fact that only one of the lichen planus patients had oral mucosa involvement and was found to be HCV positive. In other studies ( Dupin et al, 1997 ; Carrozzo et al, 1996 ), mucosal erosions were more common in HCV patients (P < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Unlike these studies, similar studies (controlled or uncontrolled) carried out in our country within the Ankara region (11), in England (5, 3), Germany (8), the Netherlands (9), Scandinavia (24, 25), France (14, 16, 17), the USA (20, 26) and Nepal (2) have indicated that the co‐association of LP with HCV was not higher than usual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In some of these reports, the association between LP and HCV was prominently determined at high rates (1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12–15). However, these other reports emphasized that this association was not significantly different than in the normal population (2, 3, 5, 16, 17). These differences among similar studies are presumed to originate from the clinical attributes of the lesions and the regional characteristics of the patients (11, 15, 18, 19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
