Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
104
23
14
2
Citation Types
5
123
0
11
Year Published
Range
2013
20132025
2025Publication Types
Select...
118
12
7
1
Relationship
1
137
Authors
Journals
Cited by 138 publications
(139 citation statements)
References 116 publications
5
123
0
11
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our survey demonstrated that 5-ASA/SASP was preferred by almost all the physicians as the first-line therapy for induction and maintenance in mild-moderate UC patients, which accords with the solid evidences reported before [ 14 - 16 ]. In this group of patients, 5-ASA/SASP will remain the mainstay of therapy due to its efficacy and tolerance [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our survey demonstrated that 5-ASA/SASP was preferred by almost all the physicians as the first-line therapy for induction and maintenance in mild-moderate UC patients, which accords with the solid evidences reported before [ 14 - 16 ]. In this group of patients, 5-ASA/SASP will remain the mainstay of therapy due to its efficacy and tolerance [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The magnitude of the effect, estimated by the number of patients in clinical remission at week 8, was similar to other studies of oral mesalamine dose escalations [30][31][32]. Our findings are further supported by the reductions in endoscopic activity and quality of life indices.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This 15.2% difference is very similar to the magnitude of difference reported in other trials of mesalamine for the treatment of patients with mildly to moderately active UC. 4 Thus, although the 9.4% difference observed in the ITT analysis was lower than might be expected, in the population deemed eligible by the central reader, the magnitude of the treatment effect was in line with previous studies. Furthermore, although statistical significance was already evident in the ITT analyses for the majority of the secondary efficacy outcomes, the magnitude of the treatment effect observed was consistently greater in the analyses performed on the population of patients deemed eligible by the central reader.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our survey demonstrated that 5-ASA/SASP was preferred by almost all the physicians as the first-line therapy for induction and maintenance in mild-moderate UC patients, which accords with the solid evidences reported before [ 14 - 16 ]. In this group of patients, 5-ASA/SASP will remain the mainstay of therapy due to its efficacy and tolerance [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The magnitude of the effect, estimated by the number of patients in clinical remission at week 8, was similar to other studies of oral mesalamine dose escalations [30][31][32]. Our findings are further supported by the reductions in endoscopic activity and quality of life indices.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This 15.2% difference is very similar to the magnitude of difference reported in other trials of mesalamine for the treatment of patients with mildly to moderately active UC. 4 Thus, although the 9.4% difference observed in the ITT analysis was lower than might be expected, in the population deemed eligible by the central reader, the magnitude of the treatment effect was in line with previous studies. Furthermore, although statistical significance was already evident in the ITT analyses for the majority of the secondary efficacy outcomes, the magnitude of the treatment effect observed was consistently greater in the analyses performed on the population of patients deemed eligible by the central reader.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our survey demonstrated that 5-ASA/SASP was preferred by almost all the physicians as the first-line therapy for induction and maintenance in mild-moderate UC patients, which accords with the solid evidences reported before [ 14 - 16 ]. In this group of patients, 5-ASA/SASP will remain the mainstay of therapy due to its efficacy and tolerance [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The magnitude of the effect, estimated by the number of patients in clinical remission at week 8, was similar to other studies of oral mesalamine dose escalations [30][31][32]. Our findings are further supported by the reductions in endoscopic activity and quality of life indices.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This 15.2% difference is very similar to the magnitude of difference reported in other trials of mesalamine for the treatment of patients with mildly to moderately active UC. 4 Thus, although the 9.4% difference observed in the ITT analysis was lower than might be expected, in the population deemed eligible by the central reader, the magnitude of the treatment effect was in line with previous studies. Furthermore, although statistical significance was already evident in the ITT analyses for the majority of the secondary efficacy outcomes, the magnitude of the treatment effect observed was consistently greater in the analyses performed on the population of patients deemed eligible by the central reader.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%