2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optoranger: A 3D pattern matching method for bin picking applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in these two images, both the foot and the ground are well visible; in addition, the corresponding point clouds are well separated during the swing, while they are connected to each other during the stance. By suitably elaborating these images, it was possible to cluster the feet and the ground and, hence, to distinguish the swing from the stance [42]; then, following an approach similar to the one presented in Section VIII for the analysis of the dummy body segments, the PCA was used to estimate the angle at the ankle. The result of this analysis is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Testing the Picoflexx For Gait Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in these two images, both the foot and the ground are well visible; in addition, the corresponding point clouds are well separated during the swing, while they are connected to each other during the stance. By suitably elaborating these images, it was possible to cluster the feet and the ground and, hence, to distinguish the swing from the stance [42]; then, following an approach similar to the one presented in Section VIII for the analysis of the dummy body segments, the PCA was used to estimate the angle at the ankle. The result of this analysis is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Testing the Picoflexx For Gait Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous attempts on a systems approach to bin-picking mainly focussed on the perception problem [25,24,23,21,4,20,19,18,16,15,14], while assuming accurate robot grasping. However, model inaccuracies and sensor uncertainties make it difficult for a majority of the perception algorithms to provide reliable object recognition and localization estimates, thereby affecting overall bin-picking performance.…”
Section: Perception For Robotic Bin-pickingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adequate implementation of robotic manipulation tasks necessitates the accurate estimation of the 6 DoF pose of the testing object (Kouskouridas, Amanatiadis, & Gasteratos, 2011;Kouskouridas, Charalampous, & Gasteratos, 2014;Popovic et al, 2010;Sansoni et al, 2014). The simplicity along with facile training sessions render template matching methods as one of the most widely used solutions for object detection tasks (Ferrari, Tuytelaars, & Van Gool, 2006;Hinterstoisser et al, 2011;Ma, Chung, & Burdick, 2011;Rios-Cabrera & Tuytelaars, 2013;Tejani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe occlusions, foreground clutter and large scale changes are among the cascading issues that put additional barriers to this challenging problem. Liu et al (2012) presented a chamfer matching-based solution that extract depth edges via a multi-flash camera, while Sansoni, Bellandi, Leoni, and Docchio (2014) showed how a laser source scanning architecture can facilitate accurate pose estimation. In Buchholz, Kubus, Weidauer, Scholz, and Wahl (2014) inertial and visual data are fused to calculate grasp poses of testing objects (Kuo, Su, Lai, & Wu, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%