Options available for profiling small samples: a review of sample amplification technology when combined with microarray profiling

Abstract

The possibility of performing microarray analysis on limited material has been demonstrated in a number of publications. In this review we approach the technical aspects of mRNA amplification and several important implicit consequences, for both linear and exponential procedures. Amplification efficiencies clearly allow profiling of extremely small samples. The conservation of transcript abundance is the most important issue regarding the use of sample amplification in combination with microarray analysis, and this aspect has generally been found to be acceptable, although demonstrated to decrease in highly diluted samples. The fact that variability and discrepancies in microarray profiles increase with minute sample sizes has been clearly documented, but for many studies this does appear to have affected the biological conclusions. We suggest that this is due to the data analysis approach applied, and the consequence is the chance of presenting misleading results. We discuss the issue of amplification sensitivity limits in the light of reports on fidelity, published data from reviewed articles and data analysis approaches. These are important considerations to be reflected in the design of future studies and when evaluating biological conclusions from published microarray studies based on extremely low input RNA quantities.

Different Hormonal Regulation of Cellular Differentiation and Function in Nucellar Projection and Endosperm Transfer Cells: A Microdissection-Based Transcriptome Study of Young Barley Grains

“…EAA fixation combined with embedding in Steedman's wax preserved morphological integrity and provided RNA of sufficient quality as well. We could show that two rounds of T7-based RNA amplifications largely maintain the relative abundance of the original mRNA population, similar to results in mammalian systems (Nygaard and Hovig, 2006). Probes from fixed tissue sections for cDNA array analysis reflected the reference transcriptome to more than 70%.…”

Isolation and Molecular Profiling of Bone Marrow Micrometastases Identifies TWIST1 as a Marker of Early Tumor Relapse in Breast Cancer Patients

“…In this study, even at a prevalence of 10 to 20 DTCs per million nucleated marrow cells, we would predict recovery of only 400 to 800 cells from the analyzed samples. Transcript detection using PCR-based strategies are relatively straightforward with these few cells, although linear transcript amplification and microarray analysis are more problematic (27). In fact, numerous EpCAM-selected samples in this study (included several from normal marrow donors) failed to produce microarray results, suggesting that too few cells were present for analysis in these samples.…”

Microarray-Based Analysis of Microbial Community RNAs by Whole-Community RNA Amplification

“…Some type of signal amplification prior to hybridization is needed. However, random PCR-based amplification is not an appropriate choice due to amplification bias and thus the loss of quantitative information (27,38). Additionally, the gene-by-gene nature of conventional PCR (while potentially useful for rRNAs) severely restricts the throughput advantages of microarray analyses for functional genes.…”