2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing biodiversity prediction from abiotic parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of the model was probably due to the high accuracy obtained for each taxon (>0.7 with several >0.9), as a result, of the selection of the most accurate of the three techniques available for each taxon , unlike with the single modelling approach. Powerful bioassessment tools based on machine learning techniques have significantly advanced all over the world (e.g., Feio et al, 2014a, 2014b; Feio et al, 2020; Mayfield et al, 2017; Rose et al, 2016; Sarrazin‐Delay et al, 2014; Tamvakis et al, 2014). However, to our knowledge, the use of simultaneous multiple machine learning techniques for simulations of environmental improvement has not been attempted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The success of the model was probably due to the high accuracy obtained for each taxon (>0.7 with several >0.9), as a result, of the selection of the most accurate of the three techniques available for each taxon , unlike with the single modelling approach. Powerful bioassessment tools based on machine learning techniques have significantly advanced all over the world (e.g., Feio et al, 2014a, 2014b; Feio et al, 2020; Mayfield et al, 2017; Rose et al, 2016; Sarrazin‐Delay et al, 2014; Tamvakis et al, 2014). However, to our knowledge, the use of simultaneous multiple machine learning techniques for simulations of environmental improvement has not been attempted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches have the ability to model and predict species distribution in dimensional space with advantages over classical predictive modelling techniques of: not requiring a priori reference sites that can be viewed as artificial; capturing nonlinear relationships; and being less influenced by outliers (Gevrey et al, 2004; Rose, Kennard, Moffatt, Sheldon, & Butler, 2016). Thus, this may prove to be favourable for obtaining realistic predictions from complex ecological data (Mayfield, Smith, Gallagher, & Hockings, 2017; Tamvakis, Trygonis, Miritzis, Tsirtsis, & Spatharis, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k -Nearest-Neighbor classifier offers a good classification accuracy rate for activity classification [ 17 ]. The kNN algorithm is based on the notion that similar instances have similar behavior and thus the new input instances are predicted according to the stored most similar neighboring instances [ 18 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%