2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Public Auditing and Data Dynamics for Data Storage Security in Cloud Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [50] focused on the issue of data integrity verification by a third-party auditor for client data that resides on a cloud storage server (CSS). The study suggested a protocol for dynamic data updates using the modified Chameleon Authentication Tree (MCAT).…”
Section: Solutions At Data Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [50] focused on the issue of data integrity verification by a third-party auditor for client data that resides on a cloud storage server (CSS). The study suggested a protocol for dynamic data updates using the modified Chameleon Authentication Tree (MCAT).…”
Section: Solutions At Data Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al 21 proposed a mechanism name “OPoR,” which outsources and offloads the heavy computation of the tag generation to the cloud audit server and eliminates the involvement of users in the auditing and in the preprocessing phases. The research 22 optimized an existing third‐party auditing protocol and make it resistant to replace, replay‐ and forge attacks launched by malicious insiders at cloud storage server. However, the above work assumes that TPA is honest or semihonest, this is obviously undesirable under different trust models in edge computing scenarios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy for the stated security problems has been proposed by A. P. Singh and S. K. Pasupuleti (2016) [19]. They have developed their approach based on two sequential ways of data auditing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%