2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response method in the Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are studies with the joint application of the Promethee multicriteria method and Machine Learning prediction in financial decision making (Mousavi & Lin, 2020); and a new hybrid fuzzy prediction method is introduced by combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and machine learning model (Ozdemir et al, 2021). For applications to energy or classification problems: fuzzy interval time series energy and financial forecasting model (Liu et al, 2020); flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic and MCDM methods (Akay, 2021); assessment of a failure prediction model in the energy sector with multicriteria discrimination approach, Promethee based classification (Angilella & Pappalardo, 2021); hybrid neurofuzzy investigation of short-term variability of wind resource (Adedeji et al, 2021); TOPSIS-ELM framework for stock index price movement prediction (Samal & Dash, 2021); cost-sensitive business failure prediction when misclassification costs are uncertain (Bock et al, 2020); multi objective optimization of crude oil supply portfolio based on interval prediction data (Sun et al, 2022); optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response (Mohammadiun et al, 2021); use of PairCode algorithm for ordinal classification based on pairwise comparison (Yang et al, 2020); and client profile prediction using convolutional neural networks (Nedjah et al, 2022). In addition, there are studies that show the application of the PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 multi-criteria method to the analysis of OECD countries (Pereira et al, 2022) and multicriteria analysis applied to aircraft selection, case in Brazilian Navy (Maêda et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies with the joint application of the Promethee multicriteria method and Machine Learning prediction in financial decision making (Mousavi & Lin, 2020); and a new hybrid fuzzy prediction method is introduced by combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and machine learning model (Ozdemir et al, 2021). For applications to energy or classification problems: fuzzy interval time series energy and financial forecasting model (Liu et al, 2020); flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic and MCDM methods (Akay, 2021); assessment of a failure prediction model in the energy sector with multicriteria discrimination approach, Promethee based classification (Angilella & Pappalardo, 2021); hybrid neurofuzzy investigation of short-term variability of wind resource (Adedeji et al, 2021); TOPSIS-ELM framework for stock index price movement prediction (Samal & Dash, 2021); cost-sensitive business failure prediction when misclassification costs are uncertain (Bock et al, 2020); multi objective optimization of crude oil supply portfolio based on interval prediction data (Sun et al, 2022); optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response (Mohammadiun et al, 2021); use of PairCode algorithm for ordinal classification based on pairwise comparison (Yang et al, 2020); and client profile prediction using convolutional neural networks (Nedjah et al, 2022). In addition, there are studies that show the application of the PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 multi-criteria method to the analysis of OECD countries (Pereira et al, 2022) and multicriteria analysis applied to aircraft selection, case in Brazilian Navy (Maêda et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C5.0 not only has low time and memory consumptions compared to C4.5 and ID3 but also is efficient as it splits the nodes in terms of the field that has the maximum information gain. Recently, publications related to decision tree-based machine learning methods exist in different variants such as random forest [36,37], gradient boosting decision tree [38], regression decision tree [39,40], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese achievements can be categorized into qualitative analysis methods, quantitative analysis methods, and analysis methods integrating qualitative and quantitative analysis [9,10] based on different calculation principles. Some of the more widely used risk assessment methods are as follows: decision tree analysis [11], fault tree analysis [12], analytic hierarchy process [13], fuzzy mathematical analysis [14], matrix analysis [15], probabilistic risk assessment [16], dynamic risk probabilistic assessment [17], and cause-consequence assessment [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%