2020 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/isit44484.2020.9173986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Systematic t-Deletion Correcting Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we have x λ1 = x ′ λ1 and x λ2 = x ′ λ2−1 because of the substitution error. According to (11), this case can be illustrated by Fig. 3.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we have x λ1 = x ′ λ1 and x λ2 = x ′ λ2−1 because of the substitution error. According to (11), this case can be illustrated by Fig. 3.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Remark 3, we have wt(x) = wt(x ′ ) and x d1 = x ′ d2 . Then by (11) or Fig. 3, and through a cancelling process similar to Case (i), we can obtain 0…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general problem of correcting t arbitrary deletions was considered in a series of works [1], [7], [8], [16]- [18]. The state-of-the-art result of them is the one from [17], which constructed a t-deletion-correcting code with redundancy 4t log n + o(log n).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, designing q -ary VT codes that can correct multiple deletion or insertion errors has been an interesting problem [ 17 ]. Recently, there were some works [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] focused on code design to correct exact multiple errors but the efficient design for q -ary codes (or even quaternary codes) that can correct a burst of at most b deletion or insertion errors is still an open problem. The authors of [ 22 ] proposed a non-binary code correcting at most two consecutive deletions with redundancy .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%