2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal short-term generation scheduling of hydrothermal systems by implementation of real-coded genetic algorithm based on improved Mühlenbein mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal unit commitment problem with probabilistic reserve determination preferred a mixed integer programming technique. The scheduling of hydropower plants was not only discussed in the past but also emphasized on scheduling of hydrothermal systems [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130]. The addition and restriction in branch and bound algorithm is considered as the central key in the development of integer programming approach [131].…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal unit commitment problem with probabilistic reserve determination preferred a mixed integer programming technique. The scheduling of hydropower plants was not only discussed in the past but also emphasized on scheduling of hydrothermal systems [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130]. The addition and restriction in branch and bound algorithm is considered as the central key in the development of integer programming approach [131].…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified Realcoded Genetic Algorithm approach using mutation based on random transfer vectors (RCGA-RTVM) was presented in Haghrah, et al [10]. A combination of improved Mühlenbein mutation and RCGA is proposed in Nazari-Heris, et al [11] and the Parallel Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (PMOGA) is proposed in Feng, et al [12]. A modified dynamic neighborhood learning-based particle swarm optimization (MDNLPSO) [13] and multi-objective quantumbehaved particle swarm optimization (MOQBPSO) [14] obtained better cost than most methods, including conventional PSO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models applied to study the STHS include non-linear programming [5], decomposition method [6], Lagrange multiplier [7], Opt Quest/NLP (OQNLP) concept [8], and dynamic programming (DP) [9]. The heuristic approaches are applied to study STHS including genetic algorithm [10], particle swarm optimization [11], differential evolution [12], Cuckoo search method [13], group search optimization [14], artificial bee colony [15], and teaching learning based optimization [16]. The authors have proposed a real coded genetic algorithm approach based on new mutation process to provide the optimal solution of hydrothermal systems in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%