2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sequential and distributed fusion for state estimation in cross-correlated noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are displayed in Figure 4, which shows that: (a) the proposed centralized filtering algorithm provides better estimations than the other filtering algorithms since the possibility of different simultaneous uncertainties in the different sensors is considered; (b) the centralized filter [8] outperforms the filter [25] since, even though the latter accommodates the effect of the delays during transmission, it does not take into account the missing measurement phenomenon in the sensors; (c) the filtering algorithm in [4] provides the worst estimations, a fact that was expected since neither the uncertainties in the measured outputs nor the delays during transmission are taken into account. Six-sensor network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results are displayed in Figure 4, which shows that: (a) the proposed centralized filtering algorithm provides better estimations than the other filtering algorithms since the possibility of different simultaneous uncertainties in the different sensors is considered; (b) the centralized filter [8] outperforms the filter [25] since, even though the latter accommodates the effect of the delays during transmission, it does not take into account the missing measurement phenomenon in the sensors; (c) the filtering algorithm in [4] provides the worst estimations, a fact that was expected since neither the uncertainties in the measured outputs nor the delays during transmission are taken into account. Six-sensor network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, important advances have been achieved concerning the estimation problem in networked stochastic systems and the design of multisensor fusion techniques [1]. Many of the existing fusion estimation algorithms are related to conventional systems (see e.g., [2][3][4][5], and the references therein), where the sensor measured outputs are affected only by additive noises and each sensor transmits its outputs to the fusion center over perfect connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Song et al presents Kalman filtering fusion [11] with 25 feedback and cross-correlated sensor noises for distributed recursive state estimators. The cross-correlation between the measurement noise and process noise are discussed in [12,13,14]. For noise sequences with uncertain variances, the actual filtering error variances [15,16,17] are obtained with a minimal upper bound for all admissible uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, fusion estimation algorithms were concerned with conventional systems, where the sensors transmit their measured outputs to the fusion center over perfect connections (see, e.g., [1,2] and references therein). However, usually the network characteristics may not be completely reliable and some anomalies (e.g., uncertain observations or missing measurements, random delays, and/or packet dropouts) may arise when the sensor measurements are transmitted to the fusion center.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%