2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2496551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Participation of an Electric Vehicle Aggregator in Day-Ahead Energy and Reserve Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 2. Assume that the aggregator engages in bilateral negotiations with each SU and that all players are risk neutral 5 . The aggregator and SUs split the maximum aggregate profit given by:…”
Section: Profit Split Via Nash Bargainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lemma 2. Assume that the aggregator engages in bilateral negotiations with each SU and that all players are risk neutral 5 . The aggregator and SUs split the maximum aggregate profit given by:…”
Section: Profit Split Via Nash Bargainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INTRODUCTIONT HE adoption of household-level energy storage systems is expected to increase rapidly in the coming years (residential energy storage grew by 405% in 2015) and become a significant share of the total U.S. energy storage deployment [1]. These storage units (SUs) have the potential of selling services to the power grid [2] but may not be able to directly do so for two main reasons: i) their individual capacities are smaller than the required minimum [3], [4]; and ii) the large number of SUs would make their management difficult even if they are allowed to participate [5]. Therefore, aggregators act as mediators between SUs and the power system [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An even more interesting hypothesis would be that our proposed system is more profitable than approaches using V2G and selling the PV generation to the grid, but unfortunately such a direct comparison is not possible, since the other proposed approaches neglect some consideration that would have been essential for the comparison. References [20][21][22] focus on V2G without PV. Reference [23] ignores battery degradations costs, and [20] has an unrealistically small and unjustified figure of 1 ¢/kWh.…”
Section: Related Research In Electric Vehicle Battery Exploitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A market actor that controls the charging rate and time of a portfolio of EVs could acquire nancial gain from energy arbitrage [8,10]. The energy required to charge (and/or discharge) the EVs can be traded through bids in day-ahead and/or regulation market at a minimum cost [21]. Numerous research studies, European (e.g., [1], and national projects (e.g., [2]) focus on trading the required energy to charge EVs taking into account di erent parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the proposed scheduling technique in [11] o ers less than 200kW in less than an hour in the regulation power market where the minimum bid is 10MW, in full hours [8]. The bidding strategies proposed in [5] and the high power uctuations of the scheduling outputs in [7] and in [21], would require single hour independent bids [3] that might not ful ll the energy requirements. The conservative bidding approach for the bidding strategy proposed in [27] covers less than 50% of the energy needed to charge the EVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%