2010
DOI: 10.2748/tmj/1287148616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal norm estimate of operators related to the harmonic Bergman projection on the ball

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…for all x, y ∈ B; see [11,17,4]. Also, one can see from the various representations of R α (x, y) mentioned above that one of the variables x and y can be allowed to be a boundary point and that the resulting function is still harmonic in the other variable.…”
Section: Reproducing Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for all x, y ∈ B; see [11,17,4]. Also, one can see from the various representations of R α (x, y) mentioned above that one of the variables x and y can be allowed to be a boundary point and that the resulting function is still harmonic in the other variable.…”
Section: Reproducing Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fix ζ ∈ ∂B. By [4,Lemma 4.2] there exist numbers = (β) > 0, r 0 = r 0 (β) ∈ (0, 1) and C = C (β) > 0 such that…”
Section: Lemma 38mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here the the relation X ≈ Y means that the coefficient X/Y is bounded by some positive constants from above and belove. Also, the sharp estimations of the function I α,s were done in [4] in case when 0 < α < ν, 0 < s < ν for the given ν.…”
Section: The General L P − Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in the spirit of a result of Zhu [9] dealing with holomorphic Bergman projections. Actually, the true harmonic analog of Zhu's result was also given in [1]: Π α L p α →L p α ≈ p 2 /(p − 1). Note that (1.2) also provides some information on the behavior of T α L p α →L p α as α → −1, that is, T α L p α →L p α grows at most like (α + 1) −1 as α → −1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%