2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal NIV Medicare Access Promotion: Patients With Thoracic Restrictive Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workgroup incorporated and expanded positive screening impairments that would support referral for NIV in keeping with the recent recommendations of the American Thoracic Society. 50 Screening for respiratory impairment and referral for noninvasive respiratory support (NIV and cough assist) were combined into a single quality measure. This quality measure is intended to capture the most critical existing gap in identifying respiratory dysfunction and early initiation of NIV and cough assist if it is within the patient's care preferences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The workgroup incorporated and expanded positive screening impairments that would support referral for NIV in keeping with the recent recommendations of the American Thoracic Society. 50 Screening for respiratory impairment and referral for noninvasive respiratory support (NIV and cough assist) were combined into a single quality measure. This quality measure is intended to capture the most critical existing gap in identifying respiratory dysfunction and early initiation of NIV and cough assist if it is within the patient's care preferences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quality measure is intended to capture the most critical existing gap in identifying respiratory dysfunction and early initiation of NIV and cough assist if it is within the patient's care preferences. 12,50 There is a persistent gap related to comprehensive respiratory care of patients with ALS, including pharmacologic therapies (inhalers and nebulization), devices (high-frequency chest wall oscillations, incentive respiratory training, lung volume recruitment, suction machine, nebulizer, mouthpiece ventilation, etc), and appropriate respiratory therapist, physician, and technical support. 12,51 Although important, at present, the work group felt capturing all these elements would not be feasible in our current quality measure data collection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with the ONMAP Technical Expert Panel recommendations, 100 we prescribe a home ventilator instead of a bilevel device for patients with neuromuscular disease who have a FVC or SVC < 30 predicted or have previously failed bilevel support. Additionally, we prescribe a home ventilator for most people who need home assisted ventilation longer than 10 hours a day; require peak inspiratory pressures above 25 cmH2O or supplemental oxygen above 2 L/min after normalization of PCO2; for patients with expected rapid progression of muscle weakness; and for those with a tracheostomy in place.…”
Section: Selecting a Respiratory Devicementioning
confidence: 88%
“…98 In 2021, the Optimal NIV Medicare Access Promotion (ONMAP) technical expert panel representing the American Thoracic Society, the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Association of Respiratory Care, and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine published consensus recommendations for updating CMS coverage criteria for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation devices. 99,100 Noteworthy among the recommendations are increasing the qualifying vital capacity threshold to <80% predicted if accompanied by respiratory symptoms, and acceptance of an end-tidal or transcutaneous PCO2 as a substitute for arterial puncture to document hypercapnia. Recommendations of the expert panel for thoracic restrictive diseases are detailed in Table 4.…”
Section: Indications For Initiation Of Nocturnal Noninvasive Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation