2024
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal metacognitive control of memory recall.

Frederick Callaway,
Thomas L. Griffiths,
Kenneth A. Norman
et al.

Abstract: Most of us have experienced moments when we could not recall some piece of information but felt that it was just out of reach. Research in metamemory has established that such judgments are often accurate; but what adaptive purpose do they serve? Here, we present an optimal model of how metacognitive monitoring (feeling of knowing) could dynamically inform metacognitive control of memory (the direction of retrieval efforts). In two experiments, we find that, consistent with the optimal model, people report hav… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(244 reference statements)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If anything, we might expect greater retrieval state evidence for high compared to low confidence hits, whereby stronger representations produce greater retrieval state engagement. Instead, we find greater retrieval state evidence for low compared to high confidence hits which may reflect differences in memory search or evidence accumulation across the two conditions (Balsdon et al, 2020; Callaway et al, 2023; Lee, Daunizeau, & Pezzulo, 2023). Together, these results are consistent with the interpretation that the retrieval state is engaged via top-down demands in service of the attempt to access an internally stored representation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If anything, we might expect greater retrieval state evidence for high compared to low confidence hits, whereby stronger representations produce greater retrieval state engagement. Instead, we find greater retrieval state evidence for low compared to high confidence hits which may reflect differences in memory search or evidence accumulation across the two conditions (Balsdon et al, 2020; Callaway et al, 2023; Lee, Daunizeau, & Pezzulo, 2023). Together, these results are consistent with the interpretation that the retrieval state is engaged via top-down demands in service of the attempt to access an internally stored representation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Alternatively, to the extent that the retrieval state tracks attention or control required to access a representation, there should be more retrieval state evidence during low compared to high confidence hits. The logic is that less evidence should require more internal attention to support a decision, possibly by prolonging the search or evidence accumulation process (Callaway, Griffiths, Norman, & Zhang, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%