Water Distribution Systems Analysis 2008 2009
DOI: 10.1061/41024(340)63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Locations of Pressure Meters for Burst Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They evaluated simulated leaks in a water distribution system and instantaneous Chi Squared Values of pressure changes. The Chi Squared Values are then separated into detected and undetected leaks using a threshold which leads to a binarized sensitivity matrix [4,5]. In 2013, this approach was extended by introducing a punishment of sensor positions with a response close to the threshold to find positions with a more clear response [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They evaluated simulated leaks in a water distribution system and instantaneous Chi Squared Values of pressure changes. The Chi Squared Values are then separated into detected and undetected leaks using a threshold which leads to a binarized sensitivity matrix [4,5]. In 2013, this approach was extended by introducing a punishment of sensor positions with a response close to the threshold to find positions with a more clear response [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been conducted in the application of multiple hydraulic simulation and GA search approaches to burst event detection. A methodology for optimal placement of pressure instruments for improved detection was first proposed in Farley et al (2008), and fully presented with field validation in a real water distribution system in Farley et al (2010a). Perez et al (2009) presented a similar method for identifying burst events, however the method was reliant on heavily instrumenting networks with more than fifteen sensors and has not been tested on in real WDS with simulated or real events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the most sensitive locations were determined, more fluctuations and events would be detected and awareness of system performance increased; for example, more burst pipes can be identified, and more accurate estimates of the number of customers suffering low pressure, over what duration, can be determined. A method to identify optimal locations for pressure instruments used for detection and location of leak/burst events was developed by Farley et al (2008Farley et al ( , 2010a. The approach utilised a methodology that searches a Jacobian sensitivity matrix produced by sequentially modelling leak/burst events at all nodes in a 1-D hydraulic model, and evaluating the change in pressure response at all possible instrument locations.…”
Section: Instrument Location and Dma Subdivisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current placement of instrumentation in water distribution networks in the UK is to meet the requirement to monitor and report leakage and low pressure; but measurement locations are not always the most sensitive for this purpose. Automated techniques have therefore been developed to identify these optimal locations (Perez et al, 2009(Perez et al, , 2011Farley et al, 2008Farley et al, , 2010aRosich et al, 2012;Preis et al, 2011;Goulet et al, 2013) and continue to be improved.…”
Section: Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%