2016
DOI: 10.3390/sym8060048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Face-Iris Multimodal Fusion Scheme

Abstract: Multimodal biometric systems are considered a way to minimize the limitations raised by single traits. This paper proposes new schemes based on score level, feature level and decision level fusion to efficiently fuse face and iris modalities. Log-Gabor transformation is applied as the feature extraction method on face and iris modalities. At each level of fusion, different schemes are proposed to improve the recognition performance and, finally, a combination of schemes at different fusion levels constructs an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FAR = 0,00001%, FRR = 0.1% [52] Retina [53,54] The true acceptance rate 98.148% [55] Face [56,57] FAR = 0,1%, FRR = 7% [52] Keystroke dynamics [58][59][60] Classification accuracy 92.60% [61] Signature dynamics [62,63] Average FAR = 5.125%, FRR = 5.5%, AER = 5.31% [64] Speech [65][66][67] Classification accuracy up to 99%. EER = 1% [68] The analysis of the presented values of the accuracy of authentication does not allow us to speak of a single use of features, however, it makes relevant their use within multimodal authentication (for example, face + iris [69], face and vein arrangement on finger, fingerprint, and voice [70], complex parameters of fingers and palms [71,72]) and the construction of ensembles of various types [73,74].…”
Section: Biometric Characteristic Papers Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAR = 0,00001%, FRR = 0.1% [52] Retina [53,54] The true acceptance rate 98.148% [55] Face [56,57] FAR = 0,1%, FRR = 7% [52] Keystroke dynamics [58][59][60] Classification accuracy 92.60% [61] Signature dynamics [62,63] Average FAR = 5.125%, FRR = 5.5%, AER = 5.31% [64] Speech [65][66][67] Classification accuracy up to 99%. EER = 1% [68] The analysis of the presented values of the accuracy of authentication does not allow us to speak of a single use of features, however, it makes relevant their use within multimodal authentication (for example, face + iris [69], face and vein arrangement on finger, fingerprint, and voice [70], complex parameters of fingers and palms [71,72]) and the construction of ensembles of various types [73,74].…”
Section: Biometric Characteristic Papers Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the threshold-optimized approach was used to implement decision level fusion where it improved the final decision. By computing the FAR values, the system performance acquired 94.91%, 95.00%, and 96.87% for fusion in feature, score, and decision level respectively [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation of LBP depends on the eight neighbors of the present pixel, where the center pixel is used as a threshold for its neighbors using 7and (8). The final code of center pixel is generated by combined the binary coding of its eight neighbors using (9). The LBP operation could be expanded to include different number of neighbors by generating a circle of neighbor points around the center pixel with radius equals to .…”
Section: Lbpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the use of biometric recognition systems in term of identification and/or verification of individuals according to their physical or behavioral characteristics is extensively studied in situations with high security demands [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In fact, the ability of biometrics to improve recognition performance and security of applications considered as increasing interest of researchers compared to conventional techniques such as token-based and knowledge-based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%