1997
DOI: 10.2307/3552132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunity Costs of Spotted Owl Management Options for British Columbia

Abstract: On estime qu'il y a moins que 100 paires des chouettes tachetées du Nord au Canada. Tous ces chouettes tachetées sont dans le sud-ouest de la Colombie-Britannique. En 1986, la chouette tachetée fut classé espèce en danger. Un programme de recouvrement, comprenant six options de gestion, fut développé afin de stabiliser la population des chouettes tachetées et ayant comme but eventuel l'amélioration du statut de l'espèce. Et article a pour objectif de présenter les estimations des coûts d'opportunité des divers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have often used simple hectare-based annual average lost stumpage revenues (reflecting the market value of the standing timber stock) to approximate these social cost components of forest conservation (e.g., NBDNR, 2000;Leppanen et al, 2005). Others have extended wood supply models to evaluate foregone revenues and costs from reduced timber harvesting (e.g., Stone and Reid, 1997;Montgomery et al, 2006;Khajuria et al, 2008). By modeling timber supply and market values in the specific land base under consideration, the opportunity cost estimates produced by these latter studies better reflect the true costs of forest conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have often used simple hectare-based annual average lost stumpage revenues (reflecting the market value of the standing timber stock) to approximate these social cost components of forest conservation (e.g., NBDNR, 2000;Leppanen et al, 2005). Others have extended wood supply models to evaluate foregone revenues and costs from reduced timber harvesting (e.g., Stone and Reid, 1997;Montgomery et al, 2006;Khajuria et al, 2008). By modeling timber supply and market values in the specific land base under consideration, the opportunity cost estimates produced by these latter studies better reflect the true costs of forest conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%