2019
DOI: 10.5539/cis.v12n2p87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinion Spam Detection based on Annotation Extension and Neural Networks

Abstract: Online reviews play an increasingly important role in the purchase decisions of potential customers. Incidentally, driven by the desire to gain profit or publicity, spammers may be hired to write fake reviews and promote or demote the reputation of products or services. Correspondingly, opinion spam detection has attracted attention from both business and research communities in recent years. However, unlike other tasks such as news classification or blog classification, the existing review spam datasets are t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The key challenges are a lack of proper deceptive review datasets and no access to spammers' identities the analysts. • The absence of fully labeled samples of truthful and fake reviews is considered one of the biggest challenges of online spam detection [30]. • Many studies on fake reviews crawl large samples of reviews and cluster them to find patterns and features that might reveal fakery [102].…”
Section: H Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• The key challenges are a lack of proper deceptive review datasets and no access to spammers' identities the analysts. • The absence of fully labeled samples of truthful and fake reviews is considered one of the biggest challenges of online spam detection [30]. • Many studies on fake reviews crawl large samples of reviews and cluster them to find patterns and features that might reveal fakery [102].…”
Section: H Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is very little spectrum for an SLR based on spam reviews. Although numerous studies attempted to construct different spam detector models [28][29][30], there is a lack of underlying research and technological solutions that assist in improving business performance. For example, deceptive review identification by a recurrent convolutional neural network (DRI-RCNN) was developed by Zhang, et al [31] using publicly available spam and deception datasets from TripAdvisor and Amazon Mechanical Turk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al [17] studied the distributions of rating scores and introduced strategies to create a dataset with pseudo-standard. Liu and Pang [18] trained multiple tree classifiers to generate labeled samples from unlabeled ones and train a neural network on the extended dataset.…”
Section: Classification Of Deceptive Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%