2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational Use evaluation of IT investments: An investigation into potential benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Al-Yaseen et al [3] conduct a study in order to understand issues related to IT evaluation after project completion and suggest the usage of operational use (OU) evaluation for assessing deviations from IT investment plans. OU evaluation is based on criteria from system completion, system information, system impact, and other criteria domains; and compromises direct, indirect and hidden costs, tangible and intangible benefi ts, and performance and security aspects of technology.…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Yaseen et al [3] conduct a study in order to understand issues related to IT evaluation after project completion and suggest the usage of operational use (OU) evaluation for assessing deviations from IT investment plans. OU evaluation is based on criteria from system completion, system information, system impact, and other criteria domains; and compromises direct, indirect and hidden costs, tangible and intangible benefi ts, and performance and security aspects of technology.…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature justifies this empirical need (Serafeimidis & Smithson, 1999). It was reported that ex-post evaluation and especially regular operational use assessments are far less common in enterprises than ex-ante evaluations, but if applied are of clear value to the organization (Hussein Al-Yaseen, Eldabi, Lees, & Paul, 2006). The desire to let results flow from one stage into the next stage of evaluation was already mentioned but with each evaluation stage working with its own targets.…”
Section: Roles and Responsibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a discrepancy between the research on evaluation and the practice of evaluation; especially, as only a few studies have focused on the evaluation of on-going projects (Al-Yaseen et al 2006;Bernroider et al 2013;Song and Letch 2012). We link the continuation decisions of IS/IT projects to project evaluations since these events are carried out to justify the choices of action, and thus the resulting decisions (Gunasekaran et al 2006;Seddon et al 2002).…”
Section: Motivation Research Objectives and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballantine and Stray (1998) consider appraisal and evaluation as part of the decisionmaking process and stress that the term 'evaluation' is often used in studies to denote the potentially different times or multiple points of evaluation. Regarding the multiple points of evaluation, Farbey et al (1999), further echoed by Al-Yaseen et al (2006), state that information systems and information technology evaluation is "a process, or group of parallel processes, which take place at different points in time or continuously, for searching and for making explicit, quantitatively or qualitatively, all the impacts of an IT project and the programme and strategy of which it is a part" (p. 190).…”
Section: Motivation Research Objectives and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%