2003
DOI: 10.1080/00016470310017703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open versus arthroscopic subacromial decompressionA prospective, randomized study of 34 patients followed for 8 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 (67) 6 (67) 3 (33) 2 (22) a See Table II for an explanation of the items. Variables were rated as positive/yes (þ), negative/no (e), unclear (?…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6 (67) 6 (67) 3 (33) 2 (22) a See Table II for an explanation of the items. Variables were rated as positive/yes (þ), negative/no (e), unclear (?…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two trials used an arthroscopic technique to perform subacromial decompressions, 7,8,19,20 1 study used open surgery, 32 and in another both were used. 31 Both methods seem to result in adequate subacromial decompression, 22,23,25 but according to some studies, the arthroscopic method results in earlier restoration in active range of motion and a quicker return to work. 25,33 In 1 study, coexistent rotator cuff ruptures were also sutured.…”
Section: Validity Of the Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Open subacromial decompression (OSD) treatment for chronic impingement syndrome of the shoulder has been well documented [1][2][3] . The space between the acromion and humeral head is normally narrow and decreases with abduction of the arm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, studies have compared open with arthroscopic techniques [8,19]. The overall results are in favour of the arthroscopic procedure, in terms of greater patient satisfaction, improved cosmetic results and shorter recovery periods and sick leave compared with open surgery [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%