2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Screw Fixation Versus Arthroscopic Suture Fixation of Tibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Injuries: A Mechanical Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of the open posteromedial approach, which avoids nerves and blood vessels, has the potential to provide a clearer view of the broken ends of the fractured bone, and allows for complete fracture reduction and successful fixation of the bone fracture fragments. In 2007, Sasaki et al (18) examined 20 knee specimens to compare the mechanical properties of tibias with PCL avulsion fractures that were fixed with ORIF or arthroscopic sutures; they observed no significant difference in tibial backward shift between the two treatments. It has become apparent that the open posteromedial approach has advantages for primary-level hospitals that have difficulties in obtaining access to arthroscopic techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of the open posteromedial approach, which avoids nerves and blood vessels, has the potential to provide a clearer view of the broken ends of the fractured bone, and allows for complete fracture reduction and successful fixation of the bone fracture fragments. In 2007, Sasaki et al (18) examined 20 knee specimens to compare the mechanical properties of tibias with PCL avulsion fractures that were fixed with ORIF or arthroscopic sutures; they observed no significant difference in tibial backward shift between the two treatments. It has become apparent that the open posteromedial approach has advantages for primary-level hospitals that have difficulties in obtaining access to arthroscopic techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, for comminuted fractures or smaller and thinner fragments, a washer was added with screw implantation because the washer could gather and tightly lock the comminuted fragments, expand the area of fixation, intensify the internal fixation strength and prevent the failure of fixation [19]. The same technology should be considered for cases that require screw removal after fracture healing, so that the whole therapeutic process and minimal invasiveness can be reflected thoroughly and optimum knee function can be obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There [15,19] have reported that minimally invasive therapy of arthroscopic-assisted screw fixation has achieved success in the treatment of PCL tibial avulsion fractures, and they feel that this technology has comparable stability with open reduction and internal screw fixation. It is well known that microendoscopic discectomy is the classic minimally invasive surgical technology for lumbar disc herniation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Sasaki et al, concluded that the technique of arthroscopic PCL tibial avulsion fixation is as promising as open screw fixation; however, it needs more surgical experience and maintains long learning curve (4). for hardware removal (5).…”
Section: Learning Curve Of Arthroscopic Pcl Avulsion Fixation Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%