2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open cell polyurethane foam compression failure characterization and its relationship to morphometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low connectivity density might be explained by the fact that the Kolliphor ® EL hydroxyl groups compete with the HPMC hydroxyl groups for esterification with citric acid. One should notice that the connectivity density correlates to the amount of the connected polymeric material to form the cell walls [29]. Cryogels tend to present low surface area because the polymer chains are compressed by ice crystal growth, which increases the pore size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low connectivity density might be explained by the fact that the Kolliphor ® EL hydroxyl groups compete with the HPMC hydroxyl groups for esterification with citric acid. One should notice that the connectivity density correlates to the amount of the connected polymeric material to form the cell walls [29]. Cryogels tend to present low surface area because the polymer chains are compressed by ice crystal growth, which increases the pore size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are extracted from published literature on compressive properties of foams. Compressive strength comparisons are shown in Figure 7A [15,16,31,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and compressive modulus in Figure 7B. [15,16,31,[33][34][35][36][37] In terms of the strength to weight ratio, the EG composites do not fare as well as vinyl ester syntactic foams, [31] but outperform them in stiffness to weight ratio.…”
Section: Property Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive strength comparisons are shown in Figure 7A [15,16,31,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and compressive modulus in Figure 7B. [15,16,31,[33][34][35][36][37] In terms of the strength to weight ratio, the EG composites do not fare as well as vinyl ester syntactic foams, [31] but outperform them in stiffness to weight ratio. The EG developed in this study perform better than the Al matrix syntactic foams [38,39] in terms of strength to weight ratio.…”
Section: Property Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the micro‐FE models were validated by matching the numerical stress–strain curve with that of the experimental. There are micro‐FE studies describing the large deformation behaviour (strain >10%) of porous materials like foams 18‐26 . An elastic–plastic material model is mainly used for numerical modelling, and few studies have also implemented a continuum damage modelling approach 19,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the validation of the micro‐FE predicted internal displacements and strains is required. An attempt to validate micro‐FE results with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was performed on open cell foam samples by Belda et al 19 The failure patterns of both DIC and micro‐FE were matched on the surface regions only, while some of the failure patterns of the micro‐FE could not be explained by DIC. A detailed validation of the micro‐FE‐predicted internal deformation and strain measurements is still lacking in the large deformation cases of foams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%