2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0524-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oocyte cryopreservation beyond cancer: tools for ethical reflection

Abstract: Oocyte cryopreservation is gaining popularity among healthy reproductive age women. However, despite promised benefits it also involves risks that are not always properly communicated in commercialized settings. ECM offers clinicians a tool for structured ethical analysis taking into consideration a wide range of implications, various ethical standpoints, and patients' perceptions and beliefs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the policy for pre-treatment fertility counseling prescribes that both health professionals and cancer patients are to be given the information and opportunity to decide on the preservation of patients' fertility (6). It is also crucial to conduct bioethical reflections regarding fertility preservation technology and decision making (26). In their investigation of attitudes toward SHC, future studies should also consider differences in participating institutions' approaches and policies in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the policy for pre-treatment fertility counseling prescribes that both health professionals and cancer patients are to be given the information and opportunity to decide on the preservation of patients' fertility (6). It is also crucial to conduct bioethical reflections regarding fertility preservation technology and decision making (26). In their investigation of attitudes toward SHC, future studies should also consider differences in participating institutions' approaches and policies in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medical rationalization of reproduction is accompanied with rational-choice approaches of social action in the news media (Myers, 2014;Van de Wiel, 2014), as well as in the newly developing literature on egg freezing. The procedure is often depicted in the literature as a "rational" strategy for "wise proactive women who take control of their fertility" (Linkeviciute et al, 2015(Linkeviciute et al, : 1216. Some scholars, as well as the women studied by these scholars, frame egg freezing as an "insurance" mechanism or a "backup plan" against the "risks" of reproductive aging (Hodes-Wertz et al, 2013;Linkeviciute et al, 2015;Waldby, 2015b).…”
Section: The Medical Rationalization Of Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure is often depicted in the literature as a "rational" strategy for "wise proactive women who take control of their fertility" (Linkeviciute et al, 2015(Linkeviciute et al, : 1216. Some scholars, as well as the women studied by these scholars, frame egg freezing as an "insurance" mechanism or a "backup plan" against the "risks" of reproductive aging (Hodes-Wertz et al, 2013;Linkeviciute et al, 2015;Waldby, 2015b). Accordingly, several potential benefits are listed, such as extending the fertility period and so increasing time for education, investing in one's career, and forming a relationship, as well as increasing personal autonomy (Harwood, 2009;Mertes and Pennings, 2012;Savulescu and Goold, 2008;Waldby, 2015a).…”
Section: The Medical Rationalization Of Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women might also feel pressure to freeze their eggs ‘for the sake of workplace and career efficiency’, and an employer’s willingness to pay for egg freezing may create even more pressure for women to stay competitive (Robertson, 2014: 10–11). In a similar vein, employer subsidies for egg freezing may be viewed as an intrusion into female employees’ reproductive choices (Linkeviciute et al, 2015; Martinelli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%