New Advances and Contributions to Fish Biology 2012
DOI: 10.5772/54133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic Dietary Shifts in a Predatory Freshwater Fish Species: The Brown Trout as an Example of a Dynamic Fish Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diets of smaller juvenile fish have not previously been characterized as they are usually not caught by gear such as gill nets. Fry can have a distinct impact on the zooplankton compared to larger fish because they are often very numerous and prey on smaller zooplankton (Walls et al, 1990;Ban et The ability of the planktivorous fish to detect and capture prey depends on factors like abundance, size and mobility of the prey (Brooks and Dodson, 1965;Reiriz et al, 1998;Sánchez-Hernández et al, 2012). In our study the trout fry preferred largest and most abundant zooplankton species according to the size selectivity hypothesis (Brooks and Dodson, 1965;Werner and Hall, 1974;O'Brien et al, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The diets of smaller juvenile fish have not previously been characterized as they are usually not caught by gear such as gill nets. Fry can have a distinct impact on the zooplankton compared to larger fish because they are often very numerous and prey on smaller zooplankton (Walls et al, 1990;Ban et The ability of the planktivorous fish to detect and capture prey depends on factors like abundance, size and mobility of the prey (Brooks and Dodson, 1965;Reiriz et al, 1998;Sánchez-Hernández et al, 2012). In our study the trout fry preferred largest and most abundant zooplankton species according to the size selectivity hypothesis (Brooks and Dodson, 1965;Werner and Hall, 1974;O'Brien et al, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Studies about the gradual development of food capturing abilities during the ontogeny have been related to differences in relative foraging abilities (e.g., Morrison et al 1978;Sánchez-Hernández et al 2013). In addition, fishes can acquire foraging information from conspecifics (Reader et al 2003 and references therein), and as the predator acquires experience, the development of a search image can improve the ability to detect food, helping to account for the greater foraging efficiency observed in adults (Ware 1971;Morrison et al 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, fish species can undergo large ontogenetic dietary shifts over their ontogeny (Gerking 1994). For example, brown trout Salmo trutta L. usually switch from feeding on invertebrates to fish over their life cycle, and prey size normally tend to increase with fish length and mouth gape (Montori et al 2006;Sánchez-Hernández and Cobo 2012;Sánchez-Hernández et al 2013). However, morphological constraints such as mouth gape usually are more noticeable during the early life stages (larvae and fry) (Sánchez-Hernández and Cobo 2015 and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%