2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online weighted LS-SVM for hysteretic structural system identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, a wide range of analytical methods exist for linear or nonlinear system identification. Most common among these methods are the least squares method (Yang and Lin (2004); Tang et al (2006); Yang et al (2007)), the maximum likelihood method (Campillo and Mevel (2005)), the extended Kalman filter (Yang et al (2005)), the H ∞ filter method (Sato and Qi (1998)), and the particle filter method (Li et al (2004); Tang and Sato (2005)). Most of these methods require an initial guess to start the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a wide range of analytical methods exist for linear or nonlinear system identification. Most common among these methods are the least squares method (Yang and Lin (2004); Tang et al (2006); Yang et al (2007)), the maximum likelihood method (Campillo and Mevel (2005)), the extended Kalman filter (Yang et al (2005)), the H ∞ filter method (Sato and Qi (1998)), and the particle filter method (Li et al (2004); Tang and Sato (2005)). Most of these methods require an initial guess to start the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Xt corresponded to the element with minimal absolute value in PCP is omitted from lYt by following steps: Note that the computational complexity of proposed algorithm is merely O(n), when it is applied in AKL, AKL is still recursive as in its former case because the matrix Kil used in recursion still could be computed recursively [15]. This characteristic fits the need of online learning modeling.…”
Section: ) Least Supported Sv Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“….N, where g l is the input data, o l is the output data and N is the number of sample points, LSSVM is governed by the following optimization problem [25]:…”
Section: State Identification Based On Lssvmmentioning
confidence: 99%