2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-018-0612-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Delay Estimation and Adaptive Compensation in Wireless Networked System: An Embedded Control Design

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed over time, using a series of realistic measurements involving disturbances such as statistical noise, the Kalman Filter essentially minimizes the estimated error covariance while the initially assumed conditions are satisfied. Over each time interval, estimating a joint probability distribution gives the approximations of unknown variables [34,35]. These estimates are a great deal more accurate than those derived with only a single measurement.…”
Section: Kalman Filter Estimation and Lqg Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed over time, using a series of realistic measurements involving disturbances such as statistical noise, the Kalman Filter essentially minimizes the estimated error covariance while the initially assumed conditions are satisfied. Over each time interval, estimating a joint probability distribution gives the approximations of unknown variables [34,35]. These estimates are a great deal more accurate than those derived with only a single measurement.…”
Section: Kalman Filter Estimation and Lqg Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of compensating delays that are large, a useful tool is the prediction approach, which has seen popular growth since it was first proposed in 1959 [3]. Nevertheless, a lot of research on the predictor is limited to a centralized controller of a single plant [4][5][6][7][8][9]. In [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], the network-dependent control of interconnected systems under communication time-delay considers predictor-free stabilization where the delays are disregarded when the decentralized controllers are designed; thus, the delay length cannot be "large".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, given the stable steady-state energy supply demanded to the base-load CPESs, manoeuvring capabilities were designed for seldom operations, mainly triggered by safety needs (i.e., safe shutdowns) [4] and with limited safety margins or capabilities to satisfy flexible operation during frequent and fast-changing demand scenarios. Since the base-load CPESs are normally expected to operate under stable steady-state conditions, for which any change of the cyber part setting can be easily detected and corrected without losing control of the system [5][6][7], aging of cyber parts is not a concern, whereas under frequent, fast-changing transients, as it is in the case of load-following CPESs here considered, aging of the cyber part cannot be neglected [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%