2013
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2013(08)05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To compare radial shockwave treatment with conventional physiotherapy for plantar fasciitis after 12 months of follow-up.METHOD:This was a randomized, prospective, comparative clinical study. Forty patients with a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were divided randomly into two treatment groups: group 1, with 20 patients who underwent ten physiotherapy sessions comprising ultrasound, kinesiotherapy and guidance for home-based stretching; and group 2, with 20 patients who underwent three applications of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Marcus et al, 2013 [23] compared RSW treatment with conventional physiotherapy for CPF after 12 months of follow-up, forty patients were divided randomly into two treatment groups: Group 1, with 20 patients who underwent ten physiotherapy sessions comprising ultrasound, kinesiotherapy and guidance for home-based stretching; and group 2, with 20 patients who underwent three applications of RSW, once a week, and guidance for homebased stretching. At the 12-month follow-up, both treatments were effective for improving pain and functional ability among the patients with PF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marcus et al, 2013 [23] compared RSW treatment with conventional physiotherapy for CPF after 12 months of follow-up, forty patients were divided randomly into two treatment groups: Group 1, with 20 patients who underwent ten physiotherapy sessions comprising ultrasound, kinesiotherapy and guidance for home-based stretching; and group 2, with 20 patients who underwent three applications of RSW, once a week, and guidance for homebased stretching. At the 12-month follow-up, both treatments were effective for improving pain and functional ability among the patients with PF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic ultrasound (Sonopuls 492; Enraf-Nonius, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) with a 50% pulse mode at a frequency of 1.0 MHz and intensity of 1.5 W/cm 2 was ap- www.e-arm.org Step standing and facing the wall PF foot placed behind, then bend both knee and lean body forward to the wall until feel tight of the calf or Achilles tendon (both heels touch the floor) www.e-arm.org plied to the participants for 5 minutes with a slow circular movable technique on the most tender or painful area of the heel [24]. After finishing therapeutic ultrasound, manual therapy, plantar fascia stretching, and tissue mobilization [25], anteroposterior (AP) mobilization on the talocrural joint [25,26] and eversion-inversion mobilization on the subtalar joint [26] were performed.…”
Section: Intervention Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is action aff ects the infl ammatory process and furthermore stimulates the local metabolism. In a metaanalysis on 9 studies and 935 patients on the use of shockwave therapy in chronic plantar fasciitis, the authors observed that ESWT groups had higher improvement rates than placebo groups (OR 2.58, 95%, [CI] 1.97-3.39, p< .001) [41][42][43] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%