1993
|
Sign up to set email alerts
One-Year Results of Semiconductor Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients With Glaucoma
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
66
14
13
0
Citation Types
3
48
0
1
Year Published
Range
1994
19942026
2026Publication Types
Select...
77
8
Relationship
0
85
Authors
Journals
Cited by 85 publications
(52 citation statements)
References 12 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The reason for cyclodestructive procedures not being widely used as a primary procedure in seeing eyes was because of complications reported in very early studies. 8,9 This study confirms the findings of previous studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] which demonstrated safety and efficacy to reduce IOP in complex cases. Furthermore, it confirms efficacy and preservation of visual function in patients with good VA pre-laser.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean IOP was significantly reduced by 45.1% (40.3-21.1 mmHg) (P ¼ 0.005, paired t-test). This compares favourably with other studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] although direct comparisons are difficult because of different study populations and treatment protocols. 4 Other cyclodestructive procedures (cyclocryotherapy, Nd:YAG cycloablation) are associated with reduction of IOP ranging between 43 and 51% with 12-30 months follow-up, 10,11 although there are more side-effects and vision loss with those methods.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The reason for cyclodestructive procedures not being widely used as a primary procedure in seeing eyes was because of complications reported in very early studies. 8,9 This study confirms the findings of previous studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] which demonstrated safety and efficacy to reduce IOP in complex cases. Furthermore, it confirms efficacy and preservation of visual function in patients with good VA pre-laser.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean IOP was significantly reduced by 45.1% (40.3-21.1 mmHg) (P ¼ 0.005, paired t-test). This compares favourably with other studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] although direct comparisons are difficult because of different study populations and treatment protocols. 4 Other cyclodestructive procedures (cyclocryotherapy, Nd:YAG cycloablation) are associated with reduction of IOP ranging between 43 and 51% with 12-30 months follow-up, 10,11 although there are more side-effects and vision loss with those methods.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our study included only patients with already “blind” eyes; the glaucoma in these eyes might therefore be expected to be more severe than other study populations. The pretreatment mean IOP of 51 mm Hg in our series was also markedly higher than in the series of Bloom (34.1 mm Hg),1 Hawkins (32.5%),13 and Spencer (33.0 mm Hg)5, consistent with more severe disease in patients with painful, blind eyes.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 56%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Such results are completely in accordance with the results of a Korean study (73.9% reduction of IOP post CCT), as well as with the results of the study by Noureddin et al (53% after diode laser treatment) 13,14 . However, Hawkins and Stewart obtained a slightly lower IOP reduction after TS-DCPC (36%) in their study 15 .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 66%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The reason for cyclodestructive procedures not being widely used as a primary procedure in seeing eyes was because of complications reported in very early studies. 8,9 This study confirms the findings of previous studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] which demonstrated safety and efficacy to reduce IOP in complex cases. Furthermore, it confirms efficacy and preservation of visual function in patients with good VA pre-laser.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean IOP was significantly reduced by 45.1% (40.3-21.1 mmHg) (P ¼ 0.005, paired t-test). This compares favourably with other studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] although direct comparisons are difficult because of different study populations and treatment protocols. 4 Other cyclodestructive procedures (cyclocryotherapy, Nd:YAG cycloablation) are associated with reduction of IOP ranging between 43 and 51% with 12-30 months follow-up, 10,11 although there are more side-effects and vision loss with those methods.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our study included only patients with already “blind” eyes; the glaucoma in these eyes might therefore be expected to be more severe than other study populations. The pretreatment mean IOP of 51 mm Hg in our series was also markedly higher than in the series of Bloom (34.1 mm Hg),1 Hawkins (32.5%),13 and Spencer (33.0 mm Hg)5, consistent with more severe disease in patients with painful, blind eyes.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 56%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Such results are completely in accordance with the results of a Korean study (73.9% reduction of IOP post CCT), as well as with the results of the study by Noureddin et al (53% after diode laser treatment) 13,14 . However, Hawkins and Stewart obtained a slightly lower IOP reduction after TS-DCPC (36%) in their study 15 .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 66%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The reason for cyclodestructive procedures not being widely used as a primary procedure in seeing eyes was because of complications reported in very early studies. 8,9 This study confirms the findings of previous studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] which demonstrated safety and efficacy to reduce IOP in complex cases. Furthermore, it confirms efficacy and preservation of visual function in patients with good VA pre-laser.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean IOP was significantly reduced by 45.1% (40.3-21.1 mmHg) (P ¼ 0.005, paired t-test). This compares favourably with other studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] although direct comparisons are difficult because of different study populations and treatment protocols. 4 Other cyclodestructive procedures (cyclocryotherapy, Nd:YAG cycloablation) are associated with reduction of IOP ranging between 43 and 51% with 12-30 months follow-up, 10,11 although there are more side-effects and vision loss with those methods.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our study included only patients with already “blind” eyes; the glaucoma in these eyes might therefore be expected to be more severe than other study populations. The pretreatment mean IOP of 51 mm Hg in our series was also markedly higher than in the series of Bloom (34.1 mm Hg),1 Hawkins (32.5%),13 and Spencer (33.0 mm Hg)5, consistent with more severe disease in patients with painful, blind eyes.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 56%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Such results are completely in accordance with the results of a Korean study (73.9% reduction of IOP post CCT), as well as with the results of the study by Noureddin et al (53% after diode laser treatment) 13,14 . However, Hawkins and Stewart obtained a slightly lower IOP reduction after TS-DCPC (36%) in their study 15 .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 66%