1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199612)19:6<525::aid-nur8>3.3.co;2-h
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

One is the liveliest number: The case orientation of qualitative research

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
40
12
5
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
42
9
6
1

Relationship

2
56

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 58 publications

(38 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
38
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our focus was on the depth of the interviews in order to complement the depth of case-oriented research (Sandelowski, 1996). When themes began to reappear, we decided to stop sampling after five people.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our focus was on the depth of the interviews in order to complement the depth of case-oriented research (Sandelowski, 1996). When themes began to reappear, we decided to stop sampling after five people.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Qualitative interviews were transcribed verbatim, and interview and observation notes written up immediately following fieldwork. We used two complementary approaches to analyze the data: a narrative approach [40,41] and a thematic coding approach [42], as described in more detail elsewhere [18]. The narrative approach entailed constructing detailed household stories for each child (or case), which offered a rich and in-depth picture of the household itself and the entire treatment-seeking trajectory and experience.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The team then came together to share and note these findings, identifying resonances and dissonances among the individual notes across all participant data. This process resulted in discrete sketches of participants (Creswell, 1998;Merriam, 1998), which we thereafter treated as stand-alone cases (Merriam, 1998;Sandelowski, 1996). Building inductively on this work, the team then began cross-case analysis (Khan VanWynsberghe, 2008) in three broad streams within the data: (1) participant experiences of the social psychology approaches in general, (2) participant experiences of one particular intervention, and (3) participant engagement with and reflection on the selected literature.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%