2019
DOI: 10.1111/ans.15081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncological safety of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery in obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background Colorectal cancer resection in the obese (OB) patients can be technically challenging. With the increasing adoption of laparoscopic surgery, the benefits remain uncertain. Hence, the aim of this study is to assess the short‐ and long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic compared to open colorectal cancer resection in the OB patients. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The outcome measures were 5‐year disease‐free survival, overall survival, circu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open surgery is more traumatic to patients, and postoperative patients have slower recovery and higher complication rates (Zhao et al, 2014). Laparoscopic surgery has been gradually applied to clinical work because of its small trauma, less patient pain, and low postoperative complications (Bellio et al, 2019;Bell et al, 2019;Chiu et al, 2019). However, the anatomical location of the colorectal is more complicated, and laparoscopic surgery may not completely remove the lesion, resulting in a higher recurrence rate (Hamabe et al, 2019;Igder et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open surgery is more traumatic to patients, and postoperative patients have slower recovery and higher complication rates (Zhao et al, 2014). Laparoscopic surgery has been gradually applied to clinical work because of its small trauma, less patient pain, and low postoperative complications (Bellio et al, 2019;Bell et al, 2019;Chiu et al, 2019). However, the anatomical location of the colorectal is more complicated, and laparoscopic surgery may not completely remove the lesion, resulting in a higher recurrence rate (Hamabe et al, 2019;Igder et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bell et al [42] focused on the oncological outcome of obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery. They found obesity to be a predictor for slightly higher tumor-positive resection margins (R1) with 6.9% in the obese versus 3.1% in the nonobese group.…”
Section: Surgical Field and Postoperative Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of open and/or complex oncologic procedures in the field of visceral surgery have shown higher complication rates in obese patients [4]. Meta-analyses from the last 10 to 15 years with high numbers of patients enrolled consistently have shown higher operation times, higher blood loss, longer hospital stay for colorectal procedures [42], oncologic upper GI procedures [47], and pancreatic surgery [58]. Interestingly, these negative effects seem not to affect the overall survival in oncologic patients, especially in esophageal resections.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), over 1.8 million new colorectal cancer cases and 881,000 deaths were estimated to occur in 2018, and colorectal cancer ranked third in terms of cancer incidence and second in terms of cancer mortality [ 1 ]. The surgical treatment for colorectal cancer has improved significantly with technical advances and theoretical progress [ 2 ], while the surgical procedures for transverse colon cancer can be controversial because of the location of the tumor [ 3 , 4 ]. For right-transverse colon cancer, the conventional surgical procedure is laparoscopic extended hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%