2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the validity of numerical wind-driven rain simulation on a rectangular low-rise building under various oblique winds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that detailed values of  can only be obtained by numerical simulation, because the number of WDR gauges on facades is usually limited in measurements and empirical formula can only allow a rough estimate of WDR. For the methodology and a discussion of the accuracy of such numerically determined catch ratios the reader is referred to Blocken and Carmeliet [14] and Abuku et al [23]. The difference between determined WDR load and the actual moisture load on the surface, due to the splashing and bouncing of raindrops, is discussed in Abuku et al [24], based on numerical and experimental investigations.…”
Section: Wdr Load On Building Facadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that detailed values of  can only be obtained by numerical simulation, because the number of WDR gauges on facades is usually limited in measurements and empirical formula can only allow a rough estimate of WDR. For the methodology and a discussion of the accuracy of such numerically determined catch ratios the reader is referred to Blocken and Carmeliet [14] and Abuku et al [23]. The difference between determined WDR load and the actual moisture load on the surface, due to the splashing and bouncing of raindrops, is discussed in Abuku et al [24], based on numerical and experimental investigations.…”
Section: Wdr Load On Building Facadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFD model used was validated for a low-rise VLIET test building of complex geometry and for a range of different rain events [25,26]. More recently, the model was also successfully validated for another low-rise building [45], for two different high-rise buildings [46,47] and for an array of low-rise buildings [14]. These studies provide confidence for the extrapolated use of the CFD model for different building configurations and different rain events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Turbulent dispersion of droplets is due to the turbulent motions modeled by the third term on the left-hand side. Turbulent dispersion was neglected in many earlier WDR modeling efforts [9,10,20,22,23,27,30] and discrepancies of the numerical results at lower wind speed regions were mainly attributed to the neglect of turbulent dispersion. In the EM model, by defining a response coefficient, C t , velocity fluctuations in rain phases can be related to the velocity fluctuations in wind:…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%