32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1994
DOI: 10.2514/6.1994-719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the trajectory of hypersonic projectiles undergoing geometry changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The free-flight motion of a slowly spinning elastic missile has been studied by a number of authors (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Although the theory of Murphy and Mermagen (6) is valid for large spin rates, no Magnus force is included in the aerodynamic force distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free-flight motion of a slowly spinning elastic missile has been studied by a number of authors (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Although the theory of Murphy and Mermagen (6) is valid for large spin rates, no Magnus force is included in the aerodynamic force distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stearns et al (1988) provides such results but details of the analysis and model are not available for verification or review. Legner et al (1994) studied the primary effects of segmentation (which is used for enhancing the penetrating characteristics of the projectile) and flexure on hypervelocity projectiles, but the details of that analysis are also unavailable. They showed effect of the fundamental bending frequency on the angle of attack and the displacement of the projectile tip and concluded that the most significant tip displacement corresponds to region in time when the angle of attack is maximized, and that increase of bending frequency leads to an increase of angle of attack.…”
Section: Static and Dynamic Aeroelastic Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these projectiles have to resist very large aerodynamic loads due to their high-velocity flight at sea level, designers have been concerned about the possibility of aeroelastic deformations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. There is some evidence that a small number of these projectiles have been forced to spin at rates close to their lowest elastic frequency and have been subject to large inelastic deformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%